CAT 2023 Question Paper with Answer Key for Slot 2

Application No 23142742
Candidate Name OMKAR KULKARNI
Test Center Name iON Digital Zone iDZ Ramtekdi 1
Test Date 26/11/2023
Test Time 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM
Subject CAT 2023

Note - Answer Keys provided in this candidate response sheet are provisional.

Section : VARC

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

The Second Hand September campaign, led by Oxfam . . . seeks to encourage shopping at
local organisations and charities as alternatives to fast fashion brands such as Primark and
Boohoo in the name of saving our planet. As innocent as mindless scrolling through online
shops may seem, such consumers are unintentionally—or perhaps even knowingly—
contributing to an industry that uses more energy than aviation. . . .

Brits buy more garments than any other country in Europe, so it comes as no shock that many
of those clothes end up in UK landfills each year: 300,000 tonnes of them, to be exact. This
waste of clothing is destructive to our planet, releasing greenhouse gasses as clothes are
burnt as well as bleeding toxins and dyes into the surrounding soil and water. As ecologist
Chelsea Rochman bluntly put it, “The mismanagement of our waste has even come back to
haunt us on our dinner plate.”

It’s not surprising, then, that people are scrambling for a solution, the most common of which
is second-hand shopping. Retailers selling consigned clothing are currently expanding at a
rapid rate . . . If everyone bought just one used item in a year, it would save 449 million lbs of
waste, equivalent to the weight of 1 million Polar bears. “Thrifting” has increasingly become a
trendy practice. London is home to many second-hand, or more commonly coined ‘vintage’,
shops across the city from Bayswater to Brixton.

So you’re cool and you care about the planet; you’ve killed two birds with one stone. But do
people simply purchase a second-hand item, flash it on Instagram with #vintage and call it a
day without considering whether what they are doing is actually effective?

According to a study commissioned by Patagonia, for instance, older clothes shed more
microfibres. These can end up in our rivers and seas after just one wash due to the worn
material, thus contributing to microfibre pollution. To break it down, the amount of microfibres
released by laundering 100,000 fleece jackets is equivalent to as many as 11,900 plastic
grocery bags, and up to 40 per cent of that ends up in our oceans. . . . So where does this
leave second-hand consumers? [They would be well advised to buy] high-quality items that
shed less and last longer [as this] combats both microfibre pollution and excess garments
ending up in landfills. . . .

Luxury brands would rather not circulate their latest season stock around the globe to be sold
at a cheaper price, which is why companies like ThredUP, a US fashion resale marketplace,
have not yet caught on in the UK. There will always be a market for consignment but there is
also a whole generation of people who have been taught that only buying new products is the
norm; second-hand luxury goods are not in their psyche. Ben Whitaker, director at Liquidation
Firm B-Stock, told Prospect that unless recycling becomes cost-effective and filters into mass
production, with the right technology to partner it, “high-end retailers would rather put brand
before sustainability.”

SubQuestion No : 1
Q.1 Based on the passage, we can infer that the opposite of fast fashion, ‘slow fashion’, would
most likely refer to clothes that:
Ans 1. are sold by genuine vintage stores.

2. do not shed microfibres.

3. are of high quality and long lasting.

4. do not bleed toxins and dyes.

Question ID : 48916816090
Option 1 ID : 48916840088
Option 2 ID : 48916840085
Option 3 ID : 48916840086
Option 4 ID : 48916840087
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

The Second Hand September campaign, led by Oxfam . . . seeks to encourage shopping at
local organisations and charities as alternatives to fast fashion brands such as Primark and
Boohoo in the name of saving our planet. As innocent as mindless scrolling through online
shops may seem, such consumers are unintentionally—or perhaps even knowingly—
contributing to an industry that uses more energy than aviation. . . .

Brits buy more garments than any other country in Europe, so it comes as no shock that many
of those clothes end up in UK landfills each year: 300,000 tonnes of them, to be exact. This
waste of clothing is destructive to our planet, releasing greenhouse gasses as clothes are
burnt as well as bleeding toxins and dyes into the surrounding soil and water. As ecologist
Chelsea Rochman bluntly put it, “The mismanagement of our waste has even come back to
haunt us on our dinner plate.”

It’s not surprising, then, that people are scrambling for a solution, the most common of which
is second-hand shopping. Retailers selling consigned clothing are currently expanding at a
rapid rate . . . If everyone bought just one used item in a year, it would save 449 million lbs of
waste, equivalent to the weight of 1 million Polar bears. “Thrifting” has increasingly become a
trendy practice. London is home to many second-hand, or more commonly coined ‘vintage’,
shops across the city from Bayswater to Brixton.

So you’re cool and you care about the planet; you’ve killed two birds with one stone. But do
people simply purchase a second-hand item, flash it on Instagram with #vintage and call it a
day without considering whether what they are doing is actually effective?

According to a study commissioned by Patagonia, for instance, older clothes shed more
microfibres. These can end up in our rivers and seas after just one wash due to the worn
material, thus contributing to microfibre pollution. To break it down, the amount of microfibres
released by laundering 100,000 fleece jackets is equivalent to as many as 11,900 plastic
grocery bags, and up to 40 per cent of that ends up in our oceans. . . . So where does this
leave second-hand consumers? [They would be well advised to buy] high-quality items that
shed less and last longer [as this] combats both microfibre pollution and excess garments
ending up in landfills. . . .

Luxury brands would rather not circulate their latest season stock around the globe to be sold
at a cheaper price, which is why companies like ThredUP, a US fashion resale marketplace,
have not yet caught on in the UK. There will always be a market for consignment but there is
also a whole generation of people who have been taught that only buying new products is the
norm; second-hand luxury goods are not in their psyche. Ben Whitaker, director at Liquidation
Firm B-Stock, told Prospect that unless recycling becomes cost-effective and filters into mass
production, with the right technology to partner it, “high-end retailers would rather put brand
before sustainability.”

SubQuestion No : 2
Q.2 According to the author, companies like ThredUP have not caught on in the UK for all of the
following reasons EXCEPT that:
Ans 1. luxury brands want to maintain their brand image.

2. recycling is currently not financially attractive for luxury brands.

3. the British don’t buy second-hand clothing.

4. luxury brands do not like their product to be devalued.

Question ID : 48916816092
Option 1 ID : 48916840094
Option 2 ID : 48916840095
Option 3 ID : 48916840093
Option 4 ID : 48916840096
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

The Second Hand September campaign, led by Oxfam . . . seeks to encourage shopping at
local organisations and charities as alternatives to fast fashion brands such as Primark and
Boohoo in the name of saving our planet. As innocent as mindless scrolling through online
shops may seem, such consumers are unintentionally—or perhaps even knowingly—
contributing to an industry that uses more energy than aviation. . . .

Brits buy more garments than any other country in Europe, so it comes as no shock that many
of those clothes end up in UK landfills each year: 300,000 tonnes of them, to be exact. This
waste of clothing is destructive to our planet, releasing greenhouse gasses as clothes are
burnt as well as bleeding toxins and dyes into the surrounding soil and water. As ecologist
Chelsea Rochman bluntly put it, “The mismanagement of our waste has even come back to
haunt us on our dinner plate.”

It’s not surprising, then, that people are scrambling for a solution, the most common of which
is second-hand shopping. Retailers selling consigned clothing are currently expanding at a
rapid rate . . . If everyone bought just one used item in a year, it would save 449 million lbs of
waste, equivalent to the weight of 1 million Polar bears. “Thrifting” has increasingly become a
trendy practice. London is home to many second-hand, or more commonly coined ‘vintage’,
shops across the city from Bayswater to Brixton.

So you’re cool and you care about the planet; you’ve killed two birds with one stone. But do
people simply purchase a second-hand item, flash it on Instagram with #vintage and call it a
day without considering whether what they are doing is actually effective?

According to a study commissioned by Patagonia, for instance, older clothes shed more
microfibres. These can end up in our rivers and seas after just one wash due to the worn
material, thus contributing to microfibre pollution. To break it down, the amount of microfibres
released by laundering 100,000 fleece jackets is equivalent to as many as 11,900 plastic
grocery bags, and up to 40 per cent of that ends up in our oceans. . . . So where does this
leave second-hand consumers? [They would be well advised to buy] high-quality items that
shed less and last longer [as this] combats both microfibre pollution and excess garments
ending up in landfills. . . .

Luxury brands would rather not circulate their latest season stock around the globe to be sold
at a cheaper price, which is why companies like ThredUP, a US fashion resale marketplace,
have not yet caught on in the UK. There will always be a market for consignment but there is
also a whole generation of people who have been taught that only buying new products is the
norm; second-hand luxury goods are not in their psyche. Ben Whitaker, director at Liquidation
Firm B-Stock, told Prospect that unless recycling becomes cost-effective and filters into mass
production, with the right technology to partner it, “high-end retailers would rather put brand
before sustainability.”

SubQuestion No : 3
Q.3 The act of “thrifting”, as described in the passage, can be considered ironic because it:
Ans 1. is not cost-effective for retailers.

2. is an anti-consumerist attitude.

3. has created environmental problems.

4. offers luxury clothing at cut-rate prices.

Question ID : 48916816091
Option 1 ID : 48916840092
Option 2 ID : 48916840089
Option 3 ID : 48916840090
Option 4 ID : 48916840091
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

The Second Hand September campaign, led by Oxfam . . . seeks to encourage shopping at
local organisations and charities as alternatives to fast fashion brands such as Primark and
Boohoo in the name of saving our planet. As innocent as mindless scrolling through online
shops may seem, such consumers are unintentionally—or perhaps even knowingly—
contributing to an industry that uses more energy than aviation. . . .

Brits buy more garments than any other country in Europe, so it comes as no shock that many
of those clothes end up in UK landfills each year: 300,000 tonnes of them, to be exact. This
waste of clothing is destructive to our planet, releasing greenhouse gasses as clothes are
burnt as well as bleeding toxins and dyes into the surrounding soil and water. As ecologist
Chelsea Rochman bluntly put it, “The mismanagement of our waste has even come back to
haunt us on our dinner plate.”

It’s not surprising, then, that people are scrambling for a solution, the most common of which
is second-hand shopping. Retailers selling consigned clothing are currently expanding at a
rapid rate . . . If everyone bought just one used item in a year, it would save 449 million lbs of
waste, equivalent to the weight of 1 million Polar bears. “Thrifting” has increasingly become a
trendy practice. London is home to many second-hand, or more commonly coined ‘vintage’,
shops across the city from Bayswater to Brixton.

So you’re cool and you care about the planet; you’ve killed two birds with one stone. But do
people simply purchase a second-hand item, flash it on Instagram with #vintage and call it a
day without considering whether what they are doing is actually effective?

According to a study commissioned by Patagonia, for instance, older clothes shed more
microfibres. These can end up in our rivers and seas after just one wash due to the worn
material, thus contributing to microfibre pollution. To break it down, the amount of microfibres
released by laundering 100,000 fleece jackets is equivalent to as many as 11,900 plastic
grocery bags, and up to 40 per cent of that ends up in our oceans. . . . So where does this
leave second-hand consumers? [They would be well advised to buy] high-quality items that
shed less and last longer [as this] combats both microfibre pollution and excess garments
ending up in landfills. . . .

Luxury brands would rather not circulate their latest season stock around the globe to be sold
at a cheaper price, which is why companies like ThredUP, a US fashion resale marketplace,
have not yet caught on in the UK. There will always be a market for consignment but there is
also a whole generation of people who have been taught that only buying new products is the
norm; second-hand luxury goods are not in their psyche. Ben Whitaker, director at Liquidation
Firm B-Stock, told Prospect that unless recycling becomes cost-effective and filters into mass
production, with the right technology to partner it, “high-end retailers would rather put brand
before sustainability.”

SubQuestion No : 4
Q.4 The central idea of the passage would be undermined if:
Ans 1. Primark and Boohoo recycled their clothes for vintage stores.

2. clothes were not thrown and burnt in landfills.

3. second-hand stores sold only high-quality clothes.

4. customers bought all their clothes online.

Question ID : 48916816093
Option 1 ID : 48916840099
Option 2 ID : 48916840098
Option 3 ID : 48916840097
Option 4 ID : 48916840100
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

The Positivists, anxious to stake out their claim for history as a science, contributed the
weight of their influence to the cult of facts. First ascertain the facts, said the positivists, then
draw your conclusions from them. . . . This is what may [be] called the common-sense view of
history. History consists of a corpus of ascertained facts. The facts are available to the
historian in documents, inscriptions, and so on . . . [Sir George Clark] contrasted the "hard
core of facts" in history with the surrounding pulp of disputable interpretation forgetting
perhaps that the pulpy part of the fruit is more rewarding than the hard core. . . . It recalls the
favourite dictum of the great liberal journalist C. P. Scott: "Facts are sacred, opinion is free.". . .

What is a historical fact? . . . According to the common-sense view, there are certain basic
facts which are the same for all historians and which form, so to speak, the backbone of
history—the fact, for example, that the Battle of Hastings was fought in 1066. But this view
calls for two observations. In the first place, it is not with facts like these that the historian is
primarily concerned. It is no doubt important to know that the great battle was fought in 1066
and not in 1065 or 1067, and that it was fought at Hastings and not at Eastbourne or Brighton.
The historian must not get these things wrong. But [to] praise a historian for his accuracy is
like praising an architect for using well-seasoned timber or properly mixed concrete in his
building. It is a necessary condition of his work, but not his essential function. It is precisely
for matters of this kind that the historian is entitled to rely on what have been called the
"auxiliary sciences" of history—archaeology, epigraphy, numismatics, chronology, and so forth.
...

The second observation is that the necessity to establish these basic facts rests not on any
quality in the facts themselves, but on an apriori decision of the historian. In spite of C. P.
Scott's motto, every journalist knows today that the most effective way to influence opinion is
by the selection and arrangement of the appropriate facts. It used to be said that facts speak
for themselves. This is, of course, untrue. The facts speak only when the historian calls on
them: it is he who decides to which facts to give the floor, and in what order or context. . . .
The only reason why we are interested to know that the battle was fought at Hastings in 1066
is that historians regard it as a major historical event. . . . Professor Talcott Parsons once
called [science] "a selective system of cognitive orientations to reality." It might perhaps have
been put more simply. But history is, among other things, that. The historian is necessarily
selective. The belief in a hard core of historical facts existing objectively and independently of
the interpretation of the historian is a preposterous fallacy, but one which it is very hard to
eradicate.

SubQuestion No : 5
Q.5 All of the following, if true, can weaken the passage’s claim that facts do not speak for
themselves, EXCEPT:
Ans 1. the truth value of a fact is independent of the historian who expresses it.

2. a fact, by its very nature, is objective and universal, irrespective of the context in
which it is placed.
3. the order in which a series of facts is presented does not have any bearing on the
production of meaning.
4. facts, like truth, can be relative: what is fact for person X may not be so for person Y.

Question ID : 48916815176
Option 1 ID : 48916837325
Option 2 ID : 48916837326
Option 3 ID : 48916837324
Option 4 ID : 48916837327
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

The Positivists, anxious to stake out their claim for history as a science, contributed the
weight of their influence to the cult of facts. First ascertain the facts, said the positivists, then
draw your conclusions from them. . . . This is what may [be] called the common-sense view of
history. History consists of a corpus of ascertained facts. The facts are available to the
historian in documents, inscriptions, and so on . . . [Sir George Clark] contrasted the "hard
core of facts" in history with the surrounding pulp of disputable interpretation forgetting
perhaps that the pulpy part of the fruit is more rewarding than the hard core. . . . It recalls the
favourite dictum of the great liberal journalist C. P. Scott: "Facts are sacred, opinion is free.". . .

What is a historical fact? . . . According to the common-sense view, there are certain basic
facts which are the same for all historians and which form, so to speak, the backbone of
history—the fact, for example, that the Battle of Hastings was fought in 1066. But this view
calls for two observations. In the first place, it is not with facts like these that the historian is
primarily concerned. It is no doubt important to know that the great battle was fought in 1066
and not in 1065 or 1067, and that it was fought at Hastings and not at Eastbourne or Brighton.
The historian must not get these things wrong. But [to] praise a historian for his accuracy is
like praising an architect for using well-seasoned timber or properly mixed concrete in his
building. It is a necessary condition of his work, but not his essential function. It is precisely
for matters of this kind that the historian is entitled to rely on what have been called the
"auxiliary sciences" of history—archaeology, epigraphy, numismatics, chronology, and so forth.
...

The second observation is that the necessity to establish these basic facts rests not on any
quality in the facts themselves, but on an apriori decision of the historian. In spite of C. P.
Scott's motto, every journalist knows today that the most effective way to influence opinion is
by the selection and arrangement of the appropriate facts. It used to be said that facts speak
for themselves. This is, of course, untrue. The facts speak only when the historian calls on
them: it is he who decides to which facts to give the floor, and in what order or context. . . .
The only reason why we are interested to know that the battle was fought at Hastings in 1066
is that historians regard it as a major historical event. . . . Professor Talcott Parsons once
called [science] "a selective system of cognitive orientations to reality." It might perhaps have
been put more simply. But history is, among other things, that. The historian is necessarily
selective. The belief in a hard core of historical facts existing objectively and independently of
the interpretation of the historian is a preposterous fallacy, but one which it is very hard to
eradicate.

SubQuestion No : 6
Q.6 All of the following describe the “common-sense view” of history, EXCEPT:
Ans 1. history is like science: a selective system of cognitive orientations to reality.

2. real history can be found in ancient engravings and archival documents.

3. only the positivist methods can lead to credible historical knowledge.

4. history can be objective like the sciences if it is derived from historical facts.

Question ID : 48916815175
Option 1 ID : 48916837322
Option 2 ID : 48916837320
Option 3 ID : 48916837323
Option 4 ID : 48916837321
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

The Positivists, anxious to stake out their claim for history as a science, contributed the
weight of their influence to the cult of facts. First ascertain the facts, said the positivists, then
draw your conclusions from them. . . . This is what may [be] called the common-sense view of
history. History consists of a corpus of ascertained facts. The facts are available to the
historian in documents, inscriptions, and so on . . . [Sir George Clark] contrasted the "hard
core of facts" in history with the surrounding pulp of disputable interpretation forgetting
perhaps that the pulpy part of the fruit is more rewarding than the hard core. . . . It recalls the
favourite dictum of the great liberal journalist C. P. Scott: "Facts are sacred, opinion is free.". . .

What is a historical fact? . . . According to the common-sense view, there are certain basic
facts which are the same for all historians and which form, so to speak, the backbone of
history—the fact, for example, that the Battle of Hastings was fought in 1066. But this view
calls for two observations. In the first place, it is not with facts like these that the historian is
primarily concerned. It is no doubt important to know that the great battle was fought in 1066
and not in 1065 or 1067, and that it was fought at Hastings and not at Eastbourne or Brighton.
The historian must not get these things wrong. But [to] praise a historian for his accuracy is
like praising an architect for using well-seasoned timber or properly mixed concrete in his
building. It is a necessary condition of his work, but not his essential function. It is precisely
for matters of this kind that the historian is entitled to rely on what have been called the
"auxiliary sciences" of history—archaeology, epigraphy, numismatics, chronology, and so forth.
...

The second observation is that the necessity to establish these basic facts rests not on any
quality in the facts themselves, but on an apriori decision of the historian. In spite of C. P.
Scott's motto, every journalist knows today that the most effective way to influence opinion is
by the selection and arrangement of the appropriate facts. It used to be said that facts speak
for themselves. This is, of course, untrue. The facts speak only when the historian calls on
them: it is he who decides to which facts to give the floor, and in what order or context. . . .
The only reason why we are interested to know that the battle was fought at Hastings in 1066
is that historians regard it as a major historical event. . . . Professor Talcott Parsons once
called [science] "a selective system of cognitive orientations to reality." It might perhaps have
been put more simply. But history is, among other things, that. The historian is necessarily
selective. The belief in a hard core of historical facts existing objectively and independently of
the interpretation of the historian is a preposterous fallacy, but one which it is very hard to
eradicate.

SubQuestion No : 7
Q.7 If the author of the passage were to write a book on the Battle of Hastings along the lines of
his/her own reasoning, the focus of the historical account would be on:
Ans 1. exploring the socio-political and economic factors that led to the Battle.

2. deriving historical facts from the relevant documents and inscriptions.

3. providing a nuanced interpretation by relying on the auxiliary sciences.

4. producing a detailed timeline of the various events that led to the Battle.

Question ID : 48916815177
Option 1 ID : 48916837330
Option 2 ID : 48916837331
Option 3 ID : 48916837329
Option 4 ID : 48916837328
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

The Positivists, anxious to stake out their claim for history as a science, contributed the
weight of their influence to the cult of facts. First ascertain the facts, said the positivists, then
draw your conclusions from them. . . . This is what may [be] called the common-sense view of
history. History consists of a corpus of ascertained facts. The facts are available to the
historian in documents, inscriptions, and so on . . . [Sir George Clark] contrasted the "hard
core of facts" in history with the surrounding pulp of disputable interpretation forgetting
perhaps that the pulpy part of the fruit is more rewarding than the hard core. . . . It recalls the
favourite dictum of the great liberal journalist C. P. Scott: "Facts are sacred, opinion is free.". . .

What is a historical fact? . . . According to the common-sense view, there are certain basic
facts which are the same for all historians and which form, so to speak, the backbone of
history—the fact, for example, that the Battle of Hastings was fought in 1066. But this view
calls for two observations. In the first place, it is not with facts like these that the historian is
primarily concerned. It is no doubt important to know that the great battle was fought in 1066
and not in 1065 or 1067, and that it was fought at Hastings and not at Eastbourne or Brighton.
The historian must not get these things wrong. But [to] praise a historian for his accuracy is
like praising an architect for using well-seasoned timber or properly mixed concrete in his
building. It is a necessary condition of his work, but not his essential function. It is precisely
for matters of this kind that the historian is entitled to rely on what have been called the
"auxiliary sciences" of history—archaeology, epigraphy, numismatics, chronology, and so forth.
...

The second observation is that the necessity to establish these basic facts rests not on any
quality in the facts themselves, but on an apriori decision of the historian. In spite of C. P.
Scott's motto, every journalist knows today that the most effective way to influence opinion is
by the selection and arrangement of the appropriate facts. It used to be said that facts speak
for themselves. This is, of course, untrue. The facts speak only when the historian calls on
them: it is he who decides to which facts to give the floor, and in what order or context. . . .
The only reason why we are interested to know that the battle was fought at Hastings in 1066
is that historians regard it as a major historical event. . . . Professor Talcott Parsons once
called [science] "a selective system of cognitive orientations to reality." It might perhaps have
been put more simply. But history is, among other things, that. The historian is necessarily
selective. The belief in a hard core of historical facts existing objectively and independently of
the interpretation of the historian is a preposterous fallacy, but one which it is very hard to
eradicate.

SubQuestion No : 8
Q.8 According to this passage, which one of the following statements best describes the
significance of archaeology for historians?
Ans 1. Archaeology helps historians to ascertain factual accuracy.

2. Archaeology helps historians to carry out their primary duty.

3. Archaeology helps historians to interpret historical facts.

4. Archaeology helps historians to locate the oldest civilisations in history.

Question ID : 48916815174
Option 1 ID : 48916837317
Option 2 ID : 48916837316
Option 3 ID : 48916837318
Option 4 ID : 48916837319
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

Over the past four centuries liberalism has been so successful that it has driven all its
opponents off the battlefield. Now it is disintegrating, destroyed by a mix of hubris and
internal contradictions, according to Patrick Deneen, a professor of politics at the University
of Notre Dame. . . . Equality of opportunity has produced a new meritocratic aristocracy that
has all the aloofness of the old aristocracy with none of its sense of noblesse oblige.
Democracy has degenerated into a theatre of the absurd. And technological advances are
reducing ever more areas of work into meaningless drudgery. “The gap between liberalism’s
claims about itself and the lived reality of the citizenry” is now so wide that “the lie can no
longer be accepted,” Mr Deneen writes. What better proof of this than the vision of 1,000
private planes whisking their occupants to Davos to discuss the question of “creating a
shared future in a fragmented world”? . . .

Deneen does an impressive job of capturing the current mood of disillusionment, echoing left-
wing complaints about rampant commercialism, right-wing complaints about narcissistic and
bullying students, and general worries about atomisation and selfishness. But when he
concludes that all this adds up to a failure of liberalism, is his argument convincing? . . . He
argues that the essence of liberalism lies in freeing individuals from constraints. In fact,
liberalism contains a wide range of intellectual traditions which provide different answers to
the question of how to trade off the relative claims of rights and responsibilities, individual
expression and social ties. . . . liberals experimented with a range of ideas from devolving
power from the centre to creating national education systems.

Mr Deneen’s fixation on the essence of liberalism leads to the second big problem of his
book: his failure to recognise liberalism’s ability to reform itself and address its internal
problems. The late 19th century saw America suffering from many of the problems that are
reappearing today, including the creation of a business aristocracy, the rise of vast
companies, the corruption of politics and the sense that society was dividing into winners and
losers. But a wide variety of reformers, working within the liberal tradition, tackled these
problems head on. Theodore Roosevelt took on the trusts. Progressives cleaned up
government corruption. University reformers modernised academic syllabuses and built
ladders of opportunity. Rather than dying, liberalism reformed itself.

Mr Deneen is right to point out that the record of liberalism in recent years has been dismal.
He is also right to assert that the world has much to learn from the premodern notions of
liberty as self-mastery and self-denial. The biggest enemy of liberalism is not so much
atomisation but old-fashioned greed, as members of the Davos elite pile their plates ever
higher with perks and share options. But he is wrong to argue that the only way for people to
liberate themselves from the contradictions of liberalism is “liberation from liberalism itself”.
The best way to read “Why Liberalism Failed” is not as a funeral oration but as a call to action:
up your game, or else.

SubQuestion No : 9
Q.9 The author of the passage refers to “the Davos elite” to illustrate his views on:
Ans 1.
the fact that the rise in liberalism had led to a greater interest in shared futures from unlikely
social classes.
2. the unlikelihood of a return to the liberalism of the past as long as the rich continue to
benefit from the decline in liberal values.
3.
the way the debate around liberalism has been captured by the rich who have managed to
insulate themselves from economic hardships.
4.
the hypocrisy of the liberal rich, who profess to subscribe to liberal values while cornering
most of the wealth.

Question ID : 48916815942
Option 1 ID : 48916839606
Option 2 ID : 48916839608
Option 3 ID : 48916839607
Option 4 ID : 48916839605
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

Over the past four centuries liberalism has been so successful that it has driven all its
opponents off the battlefield. Now it is disintegrating, destroyed by a mix of hubris and
internal contradictions, according to Patrick Deneen, a professor of politics at the University
of Notre Dame. . . . Equality of opportunity has produced a new meritocratic aristocracy that
has all the aloofness of the old aristocracy with none of its sense of noblesse oblige.
Democracy has degenerated into a theatre of the absurd. And technological advances are
reducing ever more areas of work into meaningless drudgery. “The gap between liberalism’s
claims about itself and the lived reality of the citizenry” is now so wide that “the lie can no
longer be accepted,” Mr Deneen writes. What better proof of this than the vision of 1,000
private planes whisking their occupants to Davos to discuss the question of “creating a
shared future in a fragmented world”? . . .

Deneen does an impressive job of capturing the current mood of disillusionment, echoing left-
wing complaints about rampant commercialism, right-wing complaints about narcissistic and
bullying students, and general worries about atomisation and selfishness. But when he
concludes that all this adds up to a failure of liberalism, is his argument convincing? . . . He
argues that the essence of liberalism lies in freeing individuals from constraints. In fact,
liberalism contains a wide range of intellectual traditions which provide different answers to
the question of how to trade off the relative claims of rights and responsibilities, individual
expression and social ties. . . . liberals experimented with a range of ideas from devolving
power from the centre to creating national education systems.

Mr Deneen’s fixation on the essence of liberalism leads to the second big problem of his
book: his failure to recognise liberalism’s ability to reform itself and address its internal
problems. The late 19th century saw America suffering from many of the problems that are
reappearing today, including the creation of a business aristocracy, the rise of vast
companies, the corruption of politics and the sense that society was dividing into winners and
losers. But a wide variety of reformers, working within the liberal tradition, tackled these
problems head on. Theodore Roosevelt took on the trusts. Progressives cleaned up
government corruption. University reformers modernised academic syllabuses and built
ladders of opportunity. Rather than dying, liberalism reformed itself.

Mr Deneen is right to point out that the record of liberalism in recent years has been dismal.
He is also right to assert that the world has much to learn from the premodern notions of
liberty as self-mastery and self-denial. The biggest enemy of liberalism is not so much
atomisation but old-fashioned greed, as members of the Davos elite pile their plates ever
higher with perks and share options. But he is wrong to argue that the only way for people to
liberate themselves from the contradictions of liberalism is “liberation from liberalism itself”.
The best way to read “Why Liberalism Failed” is not as a funeral oration but as a call to action:
up your game, or else.

SubQuestion No : 10
Q.10 All of the following statements are evidence of the decline of liberalism today, EXCEPT:
Ans 1.
“And technological advances are reducing ever more areas of work into meaningless
drudgery.”
2.
“‘The gap between liberalism’s claims about itself and the lived reality of the citizenry’ is now
so wide that ‘the lie can no longer be accepted,’. . .”
3.
“Democracy has degenerated into a theatre of the absurd.”
4.
“. . . the creation of a business aristocracy, the rise of vast companies . . .”

Question ID : 48916815940
Option 1 ID : 48916839599
Option 2 ID : 48916839598
Option 3 ID : 48916839597
Option 4 ID : 48916839600
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

Over the past four centuries liberalism has been so successful that it has driven all its
opponents off the battlefield. Now it is disintegrating, destroyed by a mix of hubris and
internal contradictions, according to Patrick Deneen, a professor of politics at the University
of Notre Dame. . . . Equality of opportunity has produced a new meritocratic aristocracy that
has all the aloofness of the old aristocracy with none of its sense of noblesse oblige.
Democracy has degenerated into a theatre of the absurd. And technological advances are
reducing ever more areas of work into meaningless drudgery. “The gap between liberalism’s
claims about itself and the lived reality of the citizenry” is now so wide that “the lie can no
longer be accepted,” Mr Deneen writes. What better proof of this than the vision of 1,000
private planes whisking their occupants to Davos to discuss the question of “creating a
shared future in a fragmented world”? . . .

Deneen does an impressive job of capturing the current mood of disillusionment, echoing left-
wing complaints about rampant commercialism, right-wing complaints about narcissistic and
bullying students, and general worries about atomisation and selfishness. But when he
concludes that all this adds up to a failure of liberalism, is his argument convincing? . . . He
argues that the essence of liberalism lies in freeing individuals from constraints. In fact,
liberalism contains a wide range of intellectual traditions which provide different answers to
the question of how to trade off the relative claims of rights and responsibilities, individual
expression and social ties. . . . liberals experimented with a range of ideas from devolving
power from the centre to creating national education systems.

Mr Deneen’s fixation on the essence of liberalism leads to the second big problem of his
book: his failure to recognise liberalism’s ability to reform itself and address its internal
problems. The late 19th century saw America suffering from many of the problems that are
reappearing today, including the creation of a business aristocracy, the rise of vast
companies, the corruption of politics and the sense that society was dividing into winners and
losers. But a wide variety of reformers, working within the liberal tradition, tackled these
problems head on. Theodore Roosevelt took on the trusts. Progressives cleaned up
government corruption. University reformers modernised academic syllabuses and built
ladders of opportunity. Rather than dying, liberalism reformed itself.

Mr Deneen is right to point out that the record of liberalism in recent years has been dismal.
He is also right to assert that the world has much to learn from the premodern notions of
liberty as self-mastery and self-denial. The biggest enemy of liberalism is not so much
atomisation but old-fashioned greed, as members of the Davos elite pile their plates ever
higher with perks and share options. But he is wrong to argue that the only way for people to
liberate themselves from the contradictions of liberalism is “liberation from liberalism itself”.
The best way to read “Why Liberalism Failed” is not as a funeral oration but as a call to action:
up your game, or else.

SubQuestion No : 11
Q.11 The author of the passage is likely to disagree with all of the following statements, EXCEPT:
Ans 1.
liberalism was the dominant ideal in the past century, but it had to reform itself to remain so.
2.
claims about liberalism’s disintegration are exaggerated and misunderstand its core features.
3.
if we accept that liberalism is a dying ideal, we must work to find a viable substitute.
4.
the essence of liberalism lies in greater individual self-expression and freedoms.

Question ID : 48916815943
Option 1 ID : 48916839610
Option 2 ID : 48916839609
Option 3 ID : 48916839611
Option 4 ID : 48916839612
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

Over the past four centuries liberalism has been so successful that it has driven all its
opponents off the battlefield. Now it is disintegrating, destroyed by a mix of hubris and
internal contradictions, according to Patrick Deneen, a professor of politics at the University
of Notre Dame. . . . Equality of opportunity has produced a new meritocratic aristocracy that
has all the aloofness of the old aristocracy with none of its sense of noblesse oblige.
Democracy has degenerated into a theatre of the absurd. And technological advances are
reducing ever more areas of work into meaningless drudgery. “The gap between liberalism’s
claims about itself and the lived reality of the citizenry” is now so wide that “the lie can no
longer be accepted,” Mr Deneen writes. What better proof of this than the vision of 1,000
private planes whisking their occupants to Davos to discuss the question of “creating a
shared future in a fragmented world”? . . .

Deneen does an impressive job of capturing the current mood of disillusionment, echoing left-
wing complaints about rampant commercialism, right-wing complaints about narcissistic and
bullying students, and general worries about atomisation and selfishness. But when he
concludes that all this adds up to a failure of liberalism, is his argument convincing? . . . He
argues that the essence of liberalism lies in freeing individuals from constraints. In fact,
liberalism contains a wide range of intellectual traditions which provide different answers to
the question of how to trade off the relative claims of rights and responsibilities, individual
expression and social ties. . . . liberals experimented with a range of ideas from devolving
power from the centre to creating national education systems.

Mr Deneen’s fixation on the essence of liberalism leads to the second big problem of his
book: his failure to recognise liberalism’s ability to reform itself and address its internal
problems. The late 19th century saw America suffering from many of the problems that are
reappearing today, including the creation of a business aristocracy, the rise of vast
companies, the corruption of politics and the sense that society was dividing into winners and
losers. But a wide variety of reformers, working within the liberal tradition, tackled these
problems head on. Theodore Roosevelt took on the trusts. Progressives cleaned up
government corruption. University reformers modernised academic syllabuses and built
ladders of opportunity. Rather than dying, liberalism reformed itself.

Mr Deneen is right to point out that the record of liberalism in recent years has been dismal.
He is also right to assert that the world has much to learn from the premodern notions of
liberty as self-mastery and self-denial. The biggest enemy of liberalism is not so much
atomisation but old-fashioned greed, as members of the Davos elite pile their plates ever
higher with perks and share options. But he is wrong to argue that the only way for people to
liberate themselves from the contradictions of liberalism is “liberation from liberalism itself”.
The best way to read “Why Liberalism Failed” is not as a funeral oration but as a call to action:
up your game, or else.

SubQuestion No : 12
Q.12 The author of the passage faults Deneen’s conclusions for all of the following reasons,
EXCEPT:
Ans 1.
its failure to note historical instances in which the process of declining liberalism has
managed to reverse itself.
2.
its very narrow definition of liberalism limited to individual freedoms.
3.
its repeated harking back to premodern notions of liberty.
4.
its extreme pessimism about the future of liberalism today and predictions of an ultimate
decline.

Question ID : 48916815941
Option 1 ID : 48916839601
Option 2 ID : 48916839603
Option 3 ID : 48916839602
Option 4 ID : 48916839604
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

Umberto Eco, an Italian writer, was right when he said the language of Europe is translation.
Netflix and other deep-pocketed global firms speak it well. Just as the EU employs a small
army of translators and interpreters to turn intricate laws or impassioned speeches of
Romanian MEPs into the EU’s 24 official languages, so do the likes of Netflix. It now offers
dubbing in 34 languages and subtitling in a few more. . . .

The economics of European productions are more appealing, too. American audiences are
more willing than before to give dubbed or subtitled viewing a chance. This means shows
such as “Lupin”, a French crime caper on Netflix, can become global hits. . . . In 2015, about
75% of Netflix’s original content was American; now the figure is half, according to Ampere, a
media-analysis company. Netflix has about 100 productions under way in Europe, which is
more than big public broadcasters in France or Germany. . . .

Not everything works across borders. Comedy sometimes struggles. Whodunits and
bloodthirsty maelstroms between arch Romans and uppity tribesmen have a more universal
appeal. Some do it better than others. Barbarians aside, German television is not always built
for export, says one executive, being polite. A bigger problem is that national broadcasters
still dominate. Streaming services, such as Netflix or Disney+, account for about a third of all
viewing hours, even in markets where they are well-established. Europe is an ageing
continent. The generation of teens staring at phones is outnumbered by their elders who
prefer to gawp at the box.

In Brussels and national capitals, the prospect of Netflix as a cultural hegemon is seen as a
threat. “Cultural sovereignty” is the watchword of European executives worried that the
Americans will eat their lunch. To be fair, Netflix content sometimes seems stuck in an
uncanny valley somewhere in the mid-Atlantic, with local quirks stripped out. Netflix originals
tend to have fewer specific cultural references than shows produced by domestic rivals,
according to Enders, a market analyst. The company used to have an imperial model of
commissioning, with executives in Los Angeles cooking up ideas French people might like.
Now Netflix has offices across Europe. But ultimately the big decisions rest with American
executives. This makes European politicians nervous.

They should not be. An irony of European integration is that it is often American companies
that facilitate it. Google Translate makes European newspapers comprehensible, even if a
little clunky, for the continent’s non-polyglots. American social-media companies make it
easier for Europeans to talk politics across borders. (That they do not always like to hear what
they say about each other is another matter.) Now Netflix and friends pump the same content
into homes across a continent, making culture a cross-border endeavour, too. If Europeans
are to share a currency, bail each other out in times of financial need and share vaccines in a
pandemic, then they need to have something in common—even if it is just bingeing on the
same series. Watching fictitious northern and southern Europeans tear each other apart 2,000
years ago beats doing so in reality.

SubQuestion No : 13
Q.13 Based on information provided in the passage, all of the following are true, EXCEPT:
Ans 1. only half of Netflix’s original programming in the EU is now produced in America.

2. European television productions have the potential to become global hits.

3. Netflix has been able to transform itself into a truly European entity.

4. national broadcasters dominate in the EU in terms of total television viewing hours.

Question ID : 48916816152
Option 1 ID : 48916840292
Option 2 ID : 48916840291
Option 3 ID : 48916840289
Option 4 ID : 48916840290
Status : Answered
Chosen Option : 3

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

Umberto Eco, an Italian writer, was right when he said the language of Europe is translation.
Netflix and other deep-pocketed global firms speak it well. Just as the EU employs a small
army of translators and interpreters to turn intricate laws or impassioned speeches of
Romanian MEPs into the EU’s 24 official languages, so do the likes of Netflix. It now offers
dubbing in 34 languages and subtitling in a few more. . . .

The economics of European productions are more appealing, too. American audiences are
more willing than before to give dubbed or subtitled viewing a chance. This means shows
such as “Lupin”, a French crime caper on Netflix, can become global hits. . . . In 2015, about
75% of Netflix’s original content was American; now the figure is half, according to Ampere, a
media-analysis company. Netflix has about 100 productions under way in Europe, which is
more than big public broadcasters in France or Germany. . . .

Not everything works across borders. Comedy sometimes struggles. Whodunits and
bloodthirsty maelstroms between arch Romans and uppity tribesmen have a more universal
appeal. Some do it better than others. Barbarians aside, German television is not always built
for export, says one executive, being polite. A bigger problem is that national broadcasters
still dominate. Streaming services, such as Netflix or Disney+, account for about a third of all
viewing hours, even in markets where they are well-established. Europe is an ageing
continent. The generation of teens staring at phones is outnumbered by their elders who
prefer to gawp at the box.

In Brussels and national capitals, the prospect of Netflix as a cultural hegemon is seen as a
threat. “Cultural sovereignty” is the watchword of European executives worried that the
Americans will eat their lunch. To be fair, Netflix content sometimes seems stuck in an
uncanny valley somewhere in the mid-Atlantic, with local quirks stripped out. Netflix originals
tend to have fewer specific cultural references than shows produced by domestic rivals,
according to Enders, a market analyst. The company used to have an imperial model of
commissioning, with executives in Los Angeles cooking up ideas French people might like.
Now Netflix has offices across Europe. But ultimately the big decisions rest with American
executives. This makes European politicians nervous.

They should not be. An irony of European integration is that it is often American companies
that facilitate it. Google Translate makes European newspapers comprehensible, even if a
little clunky, for the continent’s non-polyglots. American social-media companies make it
easier for Europeans to talk politics across borders. (That they do not always like to hear what
they say about each other is another matter.) Now Netflix and friends pump the same content
into homes across a continent, making culture a cross-border endeavour, too. If Europeans
are to share a currency, bail each other out in times of financial need and share vaccines in a
pandemic, then they need to have something in common—even if it is just bingeing on the
same series. Watching fictitious northern and southern Europeans tear each other apart 2,000
years ago beats doing so in reality.

SubQuestion No : 14
Q.14 Based only on information provided in the passage, which one of the following hypothetical
Netflix shows would be most successful with audiences across the EU?
Ans 1. An Italian comedy show hosted by an international star.

2. A murder mystery drama set in North Africa and France.

3. An original German TV science fiction production.

4. A trans-Atlantic romantic drama set in Europe and America.

Question ID : 48916816150
Option 1 ID : 48916840281
Option 2 ID : 48916840282
Option 3 ID : 48916840284
Option 4 ID : 48916840283
Status : Answered
Chosen Option : 2

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

Umberto Eco, an Italian writer, was right when he said the language of Europe is translation.
Netflix and other deep-pocketed global firms speak it well. Just as the EU employs a small
army of translators and interpreters to turn intricate laws or impassioned speeches of
Romanian MEPs into the EU’s 24 official languages, so do the likes of Netflix. It now offers
dubbing in 34 languages and subtitling in a few more. . . .

The economics of European productions are more appealing, too. American audiences are
more willing than before to give dubbed or subtitled viewing a chance. This means shows
such as “Lupin”, a French crime caper on Netflix, can become global hits. . . . In 2015, about
75% of Netflix’s original content was American; now the figure is half, according to Ampere, a
media-analysis company. Netflix has about 100 productions under way in Europe, which is
more than big public broadcasters in France or Germany. . . .

Not everything works across borders. Comedy sometimes struggles. Whodunits and
bloodthirsty maelstroms between arch Romans and uppity tribesmen have a more universal
appeal. Some do it better than others. Barbarians aside, German television is not always built
for export, says one executive, being polite. A bigger problem is that national broadcasters
still dominate. Streaming services, such as Netflix or Disney+, account for about a third of all
viewing hours, even in markets where they are well-established. Europe is an ageing
continent. The generation of teens staring at phones is outnumbered by their elders who
prefer to gawp at the box.

In Brussels and national capitals, the prospect of Netflix as a cultural hegemon is seen as a
threat. “Cultural sovereignty” is the watchword of European executives worried that the
Americans will eat their lunch. To be fair, Netflix content sometimes seems stuck in an
uncanny valley somewhere in the mid-Atlantic, with local quirks stripped out. Netflix originals
tend to have fewer specific cultural references than shows produced by domestic rivals,
according to Enders, a market analyst. The company used to have an imperial model of
commissioning, with executives in Los Angeles cooking up ideas French people might like.
Now Netflix has offices across Europe. But ultimately the big decisions rest with American
executives. This makes European politicians nervous.

They should not be. An irony of European integration is that it is often American companies
that facilitate it. Google Translate makes European newspapers comprehensible, even if a
little clunky, for the continent’s non-polyglots. American social-media companies make it
easier for Europeans to talk politics across borders. (That they do not always like to hear what
they say about each other is another matter.) Now Netflix and friends pump the same content
into homes across a continent, making culture a cross-border endeavour, too. If Europeans
are to share a currency, bail each other out in times of financial need and share vaccines in a
pandemic, then they need to have something in common—even if it is just bingeing on the
same series. Watching fictitious northern and southern Europeans tear each other apart 2,000
years ago beats doing so in reality.

SubQuestion No : 15
Q.15 The author sees the rise of Netflix in Europe as:
Ans 1. filling an entertainment gap.

2. a looming cultural threat.

3. an economic threat.

4. a unifying force.

Question ID : 48916816149
Option 1 ID : 48916840280
Option 2 ID : 48916840277
Option 3 ID : 48916840278
Option 4 ID : 48916840279
Status : Answered
Chosen Option : 2

Comprehension:
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the
best answer for each question.

Umberto Eco, an Italian writer, was right when he said the language of Europe is translation.
Netflix and other deep-pocketed global firms speak it well. Just as the EU employs a small
army of translators and interpreters to turn intricate laws or impassioned speeches of
Romanian MEPs into the EU’s 24 official languages, so do the likes of Netflix. It now offers
dubbing in 34 languages and subtitling in a few more. . . .

The economics of European productions are more appealing, too. American audiences are
more willing than before to give dubbed or subtitled viewing a chance. This means shows
such as “Lupin”, a French crime caper on Netflix, can become global hits. . . . In 2015, about
75% of Netflix’s original content was American; now the figure is half, according to Ampere, a
media-analysis company. Netflix has about 100 productions under way in Europe, which is
more than big public broadcasters in France or Germany. . . .

Not everything works across borders. Comedy sometimes struggles. Whodunits and
bloodthirsty maelstroms between arch Romans and uppity tribesmen have a more universal
appeal. Some do it better than others. Barbarians aside, German television is not always built
for export, says one executive, being polite. A bigger problem is that national broadcasters
still dominate. Streaming services, such as Netflix or Disney+, account for about a third of all
viewing hours, even in markets where they are well-established. Europe is an ageing
continent. The generation of teens staring at phones is outnumbered by their elders who
prefer to gawp at the box.

In Brussels and national capitals, the prospect of Netflix as a cultural hegemon is seen as a
threat. “Cultural sovereignty” is the watchword of European executives worried that the
Americans will eat their lunch. To be fair, Netflix content sometimes seems stuck in an
uncanny valley somewhere in the mid-Atlantic, with local quirks stripped out. Netflix originals
tend to have fewer specific cultural references than shows produced by domestic rivals,
according to Enders, a market analyst. The company used to have an imperial model of
commissioning, with executives in Los Angeles cooking up ideas French people might like.
Now Netflix has offices across Europe. But ultimately the big decisions rest with American
executives. This makes European politicians nervous.

They should not be. An irony of European integration is that it is often American companies
that facilitate it. Google Translate makes European newspapers comprehensible, even if a
little clunky, for the continent’s non-polyglots. American social-media companies make it
easier for Europeans to talk politics across borders. (That they do not always like to hear what
they say about each other is another matter.) Now Netflix and friends pump the same content
into homes across a continent, making culture a cross-border endeavour, too. If Europeans
are to share a currency, bail each other out in times of financial need and share vaccines in a
pandemic, then they need to have something in common—even if it is just bingeing on the
same series. Watching fictitious northern and southern Europeans tear each other apart 2,000
years ago beats doing so in reality.

SubQuestion No : 16
Q.16 Which one of the following research findings would weaken the author’s conclusion in the
final paragraph?
Ans 1.
Research shows that Netflix hits produced in France are very popular with North American
audiences.
2.
Research shows that Netflix has been gradually losing market share to other streaming
television service providers.
3.
Research shows there is a wide variance in the popularity and viewing of Netflix shows
across different EU countries.
4.
Research shows that older women across the EU enjoy watching romantic comedies on
Netflix, whereas younger women prefer historical fiction dramas.

Question ID : 48916816151
Option 1 ID : 48916840287
Option 2 ID : 48916840288
Option 3 ID : 48916840285
Option 4 ID : 48916840286
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Q.17 There is a sentence that is missing in the paragraph below. Look at the paragraph and
decide where (option 1, 2, 3, or 4) the following sentence would best fit.

Sentence: Dualism was long held as the defining feature of developing countries in contrast
to developed countries, where frontier technologies and high productivity were assumed to
prevail.

Paragraph: ___(1)___. At the core of development economics lies the idea of ‘productive
dualism’: that poor countries’ economies are split between a narrow ‘modern’ sector that
uses advanced technologies and a larger ‘traditional’ sector characterized by very low
productivity.___(2)___. While this distinction between developing and advanced economies
may have made some sense in the 1950s and 1960s, it no longer appears to be very
relevant. A combination of forces have produced a widening gap between the winners and
those left behind.___(3)___. Convergence between poor and rich parts of the economy was
arrested and regional disparities widened.___(4)___. As a result, policymakers in advanced
economies are now grappling with the same questions that have long preoccupied
developing economies: mainly how to close the gap with the more advanced parts of the
economy.
Ans 1. Option 1

2. Option 2

3. Option 3

4. Option 4

Question ID : 48916815065
Option 1 ID : 48916836944
Option 2 ID : 48916836945
Option 3 ID : 48916836946
Option 4 ID : 48916836947
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Q.18 There is a sentence that is missing in the paragraph below. Look at the paragraph and
decide where (option 1, 2, 3, or 4) the following sentence would best fit.

Sentence: And probably much earlier, moving the documentation for kissing back 1,000
years compared to what was acknowledged in the scientific community.

Paragraph: Research has hypothesised that the earliest evidence of human lip kissing
originated in a very specific geographical location in South Asia 3,500 years ago.___(1)___.
From there it may have spread to other regions, simultaneously accelerating the spread of
the herpes simplex virus 1. According to Dr Troels Pank Arbøll and Dr Sophie Lund
Rasmussen, who in a new article in the journal Science draw on a range of written sources
from the earliest Mesopotamian societies, kissing was already a well-established practice
4,500 years ago in the Middle East.___(2)___. In ancient Mesopotamia, people wrote in
cuneiform script on clay tablets.___(3)___. Many thousands of these clay tablets have
survived to this day, and they contain clear examples that kissing was considered a part of
romantic intimacy in ancient times.___(4)___. “Kissing could also have been part of
friendships and family members' relations," says Dr Troels Pank Arbøll, an expert on the
history of medicine in Mesopotamia.
Ans 1. Option 4

2. Option 2

3. Option 3

4. Option 1

Question ID : 48916816029
Option 1 ID : 48916839896
Option 2 ID : 48916839894
Option 3 ID : 48916839895
Option 4 ID : 48916839893
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Q.19 Five jumbled up sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), related to a topic, are given below.
Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd
sentence and key in the number of that sentence as your answer.

1. Self-care particularly links to loneliness, behavioural problems, and negative
academic outcomes.
2. “Latchkey children” refers to children who routinely return home from school to empty
homes and take care of themselves for extended periods of time.
3. Although self-care generally points to negative outcomes, it is important to consider
that the bulk of research has yet to track long-term consequences.
4. In research and practice, the phrase “children in self-care” has come to replace
latchkey in an effort to more accurately reflect the nature of their circumstances.
5. Although parents might believe that self-care would be beneficial for development,
recent research has found quite the opposite.
Case Sensitivity: No
Answer Type: Equal
Possible Answer: 3
Given 2
Answer :

Question Type : SA
Question ID : 48916816240
Status : Answered

Q.20 Five jumbled up sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), related to a topic, are given below.
Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd
sentence and key in the number of that sentence as your answer.
1. The banning of Northern Lights could be considered a precursor to censoring books
for “moral”, world view or religious reasons.
2. Attempts to ban books are attempts to silence authors who have summoned immense
courage in telling their stories.
3. Now the banning and challenging of books in the US has escalated to an
unprecedented level.
4. The widely acclaimed fantasy novel Northern Lights was banned in some parts of the
US, and was the second most challenged book in the US.
5. The American Library Association documented an unparalleled number of reported
book challenges in 2022, about 2,500 unique titles.
Case Sensitivity: No
Answer Type: Equal
Possible Answer: 2
Given 5
Answer :

Question Type : SA
Question ID : 48916816031
Status : Answered

Q.21 The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3 and 4) given below, when properly sequenced, would
yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the
sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer.

1. Like the ants that make up a colony, no single neuron holds complex information like
self-awareness, hope or pride.
2. Although the human brain is not yet understood enough to identify the mechanism by
which emergence functions, most neurobiologists agree that complex interconnections
among the parts give rise to qualities that belong only to the whole.
3. Nonetheless, the sum of all neurons in the nervous system generate complex human
emotions like fear and joy, none of which can be attributed to a single neuron.
4. Human consciousness is often called an emergent property of the human brain.
Case Sensitivity: No
Answer Type: Equal
Possible Answer: 4132
Given 4231
Answer :

Question Type : SA
Question ID : 48916815095
Status : Answered

Q.22 The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3 and 4) given below, when properly sequenced, would
yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the
sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer.

1. Contemporary African writing like ‘The Bottled Leopard’ voices this theme using two
children and two backgrounds to juxtapose two varying cultures.
2. Chukwuemeka Ike explores the conflict, and casts the Western tradition as
condescending, enveloping and unaccommodating towards local African practice.
3. However, their views contradict the reality, for a rich and sustaining local African
cultural ethos exists for all who care, to see and experience.
4. Western Christian concepts tend to deny or feign ignorance about the existence of a
genuine and enduring indigenous African tradition.
Case Sensitivity: No
Answer Type: Equal
Possible Answer: 4321
Given 1243
Answer :

Question Type : SA
Question ID : 48916816173
Status : Answered

Q.23 The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that
best captures the essence of the passage.

People spontaneously create counterfactual alternatives to reality when they think “if only”
or “what if” and imagine how the past could have been different. The mind computes
counterfactuals for many reasons. Counterfactuals explain the past and prepare for the
future, they implicate various relations including causal ones, and they affect intentions and
decisions. They modulate emotions such as regret and relief, and they support moral
judgments such as blame. The ability to create counterfactuals develops throughout
childhood and contributes to reasoning about other people's beliefs, including their false
beliefs.
Ans 1. Counterfactual alternatives to reality are created for a variety of reasons and is part
of one's developmental process.
2. Counterfactual thinking helps to reverse past and future actions and reason out false
beliefs.

3. Counterfactuals help people to prepare for the future by understanding intentions and
making decisions.
4. People create counterfactual alternatives to reality for various reasons, including
reasoning about other people's beliefs.

Question ID : 48916816211
Option 1 ID : 48916840498
Option 2 ID : 48916840500
Option 3 ID : 48916840499
Option 4 ID : 48916840497
Status : Answered
Chosen Option : 1

Q.24 The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that
best captures the essence of the passage.

Heatwaves are becoming longer, frequent and intense due to climate change. The impacts
of extreme heat are unevenly experienced; with older people and young children, those with
pre-existing medical conditions and on low incomes significantly more vulnerable.
Adaptation to heatwaves is a significant public policy concern. Research conducted among
at-risk people in the UK reveals that even vulnerable people do not perceive themselves as
at risk of extreme heat; therefore, early warnings of extreme heat events do not perform as
intended. This suggests that understanding how extreme heat is narrated is very important.
The news media play a central role in this process and can help warn people about the
potential danger, as well as about impacts on infrastructure and society.
Ans 1.
News stories help in warning about heatwaves, but they have to become more effective.
2.
Heatwaves pose an enormous risk; the media plays a pivotal role in alerting people to this
danger.
3.
People are vulnerable to heatwaves caused due to climate change, measures taken are
ineffective.
4.
Protection from heat waves is important but current reports and public policies seem
ineffective.

Question ID : 48916816024
Option 1 ID : 48916839881
Option 2 ID : 48916839880
Option 3 ID : 48916839882
Option 4 ID : 48916839879
Status : Answered
Chosen Option : 2

Section : DILR

Comprehension:
Odsville has five firms – Alfloo, Bzygoo, Czechy, Drjbna and Elavalaki. Each of these firms was
founded in some year and also closed down a few years later.

Each firm raised Rs. 1 crore in its first and last year of existence. The amount each firm raised
every year increased until it reached a maximum, and then decreased until the firm closed
down. No firm raised the same amount of money in two consecutive years. Each annual
increase and decrease was either by Rs. 1 crore or by Rs. 2 crores.

The table below provides partial information about the five firms.
Firm First year of Last year of Total amount raised (Rs.
existence existence crores)
Alfloo 2009 2016 21
Bzygoo 2012 2015
Czechy 2013 9
Drjbna 2011 2015 10
Elavalaki 2010 13

SubQuestion No : 1
Q.1 For which firm(s) can the amounts raised by them be concluded with certainty in each
year?
Ans 1. Only Drjbna

2. Only Czechy and Drjbna

3. Only Czechy

4. Only Bzygoo and Czechy and Drjbna

Question ID : 48916816101
Option 1 ID : 48916840122
Option 2 ID : 48916840123
Option 3 ID : 48916840121
Option 4 ID : 48916840124
Not Attempted and
Status :
Marked For Review
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
Odsville has five firms – Alfloo, Bzygoo, Czechy, Drjbna and Elavalaki. Each of these firms was
founded in some year and also closed down a few years later.

Each firm raised Rs. 1 crore in its first and last year of existence. The amount each firm raised
every year increased until it reached a maximum, and then decreased until the firm closed
down. No firm raised the same amount of money in two consecutive years. Each annual
increase and decrease was either by Rs. 1 crore or by Rs. 2 crores.

The table below provides partial information about the five firms.
Firm First year of Last year of Total amount raised (Rs.
existence existence crores)
Alfloo 2009 2016 21
Bzygoo 2012 2015
Czechy 2013 9
Drjbna 2011 2015 10
Elavalaki 2010 13

SubQuestion No : 2
Q.2 What best can be concluded about the total amount of money raised in 2015?
Ans 1. It is either Rs. 7 crores or Rs. 8 crores.

2. It is either Rs. 7 crores or Rs. 8 crores or Rs. 9 crores.

3. It is either Rs. 8 crores or Rs. 9 crores.

4. It is exactly Rs. 8 crores.

Question ID : 48916816102
Option 1 ID : 48916840126
Option 2 ID : 48916840128
Option 3 ID : 48916840127
Option 4 ID : 48916840125
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
Odsville has five firms – Alfloo, Bzygoo, Czechy, Drjbna and Elavalaki. Each of these firms was
founded in some year and also closed down a few years later.

Each firm raised Rs. 1 crore in its first and last year of existence. The amount each firm raised
every year increased until it reached a maximum, and then decreased until the firm closed
down. No firm raised the same amount of money in two consecutive years. Each annual
increase and decrease was either by Rs. 1 crore or by Rs. 2 crores.

The table below provides partial information about the five firms.
Firm First year of Last year of Total amount raised (Rs.
existence existence crores)
Alfloo 2009 2016 21
Bzygoo 2012 2015
Czechy 2013 9
Drjbna 2011 2015 10
Elavalaki 2010 13

SubQuestion No : 4
Q.4 If Elavalaki raised Rs. 3 crores in 2013, then what is the smallest possible total amount of
money (in Rs. crores) that could have been raised by all the companies in 2012?
Ans 1. 12

2. 11

3. 9

4. 10

Question ID : 48916816105
Option 1 ID : 48916840140
Option 2 ID : 48916840139
Option 3 ID : 48916840137
Option 4 ID : 48916840138
Not Attempted and
Status :
Marked For Review
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
Odsville has five firms – Alfloo, Bzygoo, Czechy, Drjbna and Elavalaki. Each of these firms was
founded in some year and also closed down a few years later.

Each firm raised Rs. 1 crore in its first and last year of existence. The amount each firm raised
every year increased until it reached a maximum, and then decreased until the firm closed
down. No firm raised the same amount of money in two consecutive years. Each annual
increase and decrease was either by Rs. 1 crore or by Rs. 2 crores.

The table below provides partial information about the five firms.
Firm First year of Last year of Total amount raised (Rs.
existence existence crores)
Alfloo 2009 2016 21
Bzygoo 2012 2015
Czechy 2013 9
Drjbna 2011 2015 10
Elavalaki 2010 13

SubQuestion No : 5
Q.5 If the total amount of money raised in 2014 is Rs. 12 crores, then which of the following is
not possible?
Ans 1. Alfloo raised the same amount of money as Drjbna in 2013.

2. Bzygoo raised more money than Elavalaki in 2014.

3. Bzygoo raised the same amount of money as Elavalaki in 2013.

4. Alfloo raised the same amount of money as Bzygoo in 2014.

Question ID : 48916816106
Option 1 ID : 48916840141
Option 2 ID : 48916840143
Option 3 ID : 48916840142
Option 4 ID : 48916840144
Not Attempted and
Status :
Marked For Review
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
Three participants – Akhil, Bimal and Chatur participate in a random draw competition for five
days. Every day, each participant randomly picks up a ball numbered between 1 and 9. The
number on the ball determines his score on that day. The total score of a participant is the sum
of his scores attained in the five days. The total score of a day is the sum of participants’ scores
on that day. The 2-day average on a day, except on Day 1, is the average of the total scores of
that day and of the previous day. For example, if the total scores of Day 1 and Day 2 are 25 and
20, then the 2-day average on Day 2 is calculated as 22.5. Table 1 gives the 2-day averages for
Days 2 through 5.
Table 1: 2-day averages for Days 2 through 5
Day 2 Day 3 Day4 Day 5

15 15.5 16 17

Participants are ranked each day, with the person having the maximum score being awarded the
minimum rank (1) on that day. If there is a tie, all participants with the tied score are awarded
the best available rank. For example, if on a day Akhil, Bimal, and Chatur score 8, 7 and 7
respectively, then their ranks will be 1, 2 and 2 respectively on that day. These ranks are given in
Table 2.
Table 2: Ranks of participants on each day
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5

Akhil 1 2 2 3 3
Bimal 2 3 2 1 1
Chatur 3 1 1 2 2

The following information is also known.
1. Chatur always scores in multiples of 3. His score on Day 2 is the unique highest score in the
competition. His minimum score is observed only on Day 1, and it matches Akhil’s score on Day
4.
2. The total score on Day 3 is the same as the total score on Day 4.
3. Bimal’s scores are the same on Day 1 and Day 3.

SubQuestion No : 11
Q.1 What is Akhil's score on Day 1?
1
Ans 1. 5

2. 6

3. 8

4. 7

Question ID : 48916816246
Option 1 ID : 48916840610
Option 2 ID : 48916840611
Option 3 ID : 48916840613
Option 4 ID : 48916840612
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
Three participants – Akhil, Bimal and Chatur participate in a random draw competition for five
days. Every day, each participant randomly picks up a ball numbered between 1 and 9. The
number on the ball determines his score on that day. The total score of a participant is the sum
of his scores attained in the five days. The total score of a day is the sum of participants’ scores
on that day. The 2-day average on a day, except on Day 1, is the average of the total scores of
that day and of the previous day. For example, if the total scores of Day 1 and Day 2 are 25 and
20, then the 2-day average on Day 2 is calculated as 22.5. Table 1 gives the 2-day averages for
Days 2 through 5.
Table 1: 2-day averages for Days 2 through 5
Day 2 Day 3 Day4 Day 5

15 15.5 16 17

Participants are ranked each day, with the person having the maximum score being awarded the
minimum rank (1) on that day. If there is a tie, all participants with the tied score are awarded
the best available rank. For example, if on a day Akhil, Bimal, and Chatur score 8, 7 and 7
respectively, then their ranks will be 1, 2 and 2 respectively on that day. These ranks are given in
Table 2.
Table 2: Ranks of participants on each day
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5

Akhil 1 2 2 3 3
Bimal 2 3 2 1 1
Chatur 3 1 1 2 2

The following information is also known.
1. Chatur always scores in multiples of 3. His score on Day 2 is the unique highest score in the
competition. His minimum score is observed only on Day 1, and it matches Akhil’s score on Day
4.
2. The total score on Day 3 is the same as the total score on Day 4.
3. Bimal’s scores are the same on Day 1 and Day 3.

SubQuestion No : 12
Q.1 Who attains the maximum total score?
2
Ans 1. Cannot be determined

2. Akhil

3. Chatur

4. Bimal

Question ID : 48916816247
Option 1 ID : 48916840617
Option 2 ID : 48916840614
Option 3 ID : 48916840616
Option 4 ID : 48916840615
Status : Answered
Chosen Option : 3

Comprehension:
Three participants – Akhil, Bimal and Chatur participate in a random draw competition for five
days. Every day, each participant randomly picks up a ball numbered between 1 and 9. The
number on the ball determines his score on that day. The total score of a participant is the sum
of his scores attained in the five days. The total score of a day is the sum of participants’ scores
on that day. The 2-day average on a day, except on Day 1, is the average of the total scores of
that day and of the previous day. For example, if the total scores of Day 1 and Day 2 are 25 and
20, then the 2-day average on Day 2 is calculated as 22.5. Table 1 gives the 2-day averages for
Days 2 through 5.
Table 1: 2-day averages for Days 2 through 5
Day 2 Day 3 Day4 Day 5

15 15.5 16 17

Participants are ranked each day, with the person having the maximum score being awarded the
minimum rank (1) on that day. If there is a tie, all participants with the tied score are awarded
the best available rank. For example, if on a day Akhil, Bimal, and Chatur score 8, 7 and 7
respectively, then their ranks will be 1, 2 and 2 respectively on that day. These ranks are given in
Table 2.
Table 2: Ranks of participants on each day
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5

Akhil 1 2 2 3 3
Bimal 2 3 2 1 1
Chatur 3 1 1 2 2

The following information is also known.
1. Chatur always scores in multiples of 3. His score on Day 2 is the unique highest score in the
competition. His minimum score is observed only on Day 1, and it matches Akhil’s score on Day
4.
2. The total score on Day 3 is the same as the total score on Day 4.
3. Bimal’s scores are the same on Day 1 and Day 3.

SubQuestion No : 14
Q.1 If the total score of Bimal is a multiple of 3, what is the score of Akhil on Day 2?
4
Ans 1. 4

2. Cannot be determined

3. 5

4. 6

Question ID : 48916816248
Option 1 ID : 48916840618
Option 2 ID : 48916840621
Option 3 ID : 48916840619
Option 4 ID : 48916840620
Status : Not Answered
Chosen Option : --

Comprehension:
Anjali, Bipasha, and Chitra visited an entertainment park that has four rides. Each ride lasts
one hour and can accommodate one visitor at one point. All rides begin at 9 am and must be
completed by 5 pm except for Ride-3, for which the last ride has to be completed by 1 pm.
Ride gates open every 30 minutes, e.g. 10 am, 10:30 am, and so on. Whenever a ride gate
opens, and there is no visitor inside, the first visitor waiting in the queue buys the ticket just
before taking the ride. The ticket prices are Rs. 20, Rs. 50, Rs. 30 and Rs. 40 for Rides 1 to 4,
respectively. Each of the three visitors took at least one ride and did not necessarily take all
rides. None of them took the same ride more than once. The movement time from one ride to
another is negligible, and a visitor leaves the ride immediately after the completion of the ride.
No one takes a break inside the park unless mentioned explicitly.

The following information is also known.

1. Chitra never waited in the queue and completed her visit by 11 am after spending Rs. 50 to
pay for the ticket(s).
2. Anjali took Ride-1 at 11 am after waiting for 30 mins for Chitra to complete it. It was the
only ride where Anjali waited.
3. Bipasha began her first of three rides at 11:30 am. All three visitors incurred the same
amount of ticket expense by 12:15 pm.
4. The last ride taken by Anjali and Bipasha was the same, where Bipasha waited 30 mins for
Anjali to complete her ride. Before standing in the queue for that ride, Bipasha took a 1-hour
coffee break after completing her previous ride.

SubQuestion No : 16
Q.16 What was the total amount spent on tickets (in Rs.) by Bipasha?
Ans 1. 120

2. 100

3. 90

4. 110

Question ID : 48916816253
Option 1 ID : 48916840637
Option 2 ID : 48916840635
Option 3 ID : 48916840634
Option 4 ID : 48916840636
Status : Answered
Chosen Option : 4

Comprehension:
Anjali, Bipasha, and Chitra visited an entertainment park that has four rides. Each ride lasts
one hour and can accommodate one visitor at one point. All rides begin at 9 am and must be
completed by 5 pm except for Ride-3, for which the last ride has to be completed by 1 pm.
Ride gates open every 30 minutes, e.g. 10 am, 10:30 am, and so on. Whenever a ride gate
opens, and there is no visitor inside, the first visitor waiting in the queue buys the ticket just
before taking the ride. The ticket prices are Rs. 20, Rs. 50, Rs. 30 and Rs. 40 for Rides 1 to 4,
respectively. Each of the three visitors took at least one ride and did not necessarily take all
rides. None of them took the same ride more than once. The movement time from one ride to
another is negligible, and a visitor leaves the ride immediately after the completion of the ride.
No one takes a break inside the park unless mentioned explicitly.

The following information is also known.

1. Chitra never waited in the queue and completed her visit by 11 am after spending Rs. 50 to
pay for the ticket(s).
2. Anjali took Ride-1 at 11 am after waiting for 30 mins for Chitra to complete it. It was the
only ride where Anjali waited.
3. Bipasha began her first of three rides at 11:30 am. All three visitors incurred the same
amount of ticket expense by 12:15 pm.
4. The last ride taken by Anjali and Bipasha was the same, where Bipasha waited 30 mins for
Anjali to complete her ride. Before standing in the queue for that ride, Bipasha took a 1-hour
coffee break after completing her previous ride.

SubQuestion No : 17
Q.17 Which were all the rides that Anjali completed by 2:00 pm?
Ans 1. Ride-1, Ride-2, and Ride-4

2. Ride-1 and Ride-4

3. Ride-1 and Ride-3

4. Ride-1, Ride-2, and Ride-3

Question ID : 48916816254
Option 1 ID : 48916840639
Option 2 ID : 48916840638
Option 3 ID : 48916840641
Option 4 ID : 48916840640
Status : Answered
Chosen Option : 1

Comprehension:
Anjali, Bipasha, and Chitra visited an entertainment park that has four rides. Each ride lasts
one hour and can accommodate one visitor at one point. All rides begin at 9 am and must be
completed by 5 pm except for Ride-3, for which the last ride has to be completed by 1 pm.
Ride gates open every 30 minutes, e.g. 10 am, 10:30 am, and so on. Whenever a ride gate
opens, and there is no visitor inside, the first visitor waiting in the queue buys the ticket just
before taking the ride. The ticket prices are Rs. 20, Rs. 50, Rs. 30 and Rs. 40 for Rides 1 to 4,
respectively. Each of the three visitors took at least one ride and did not necessarily take all
rides. None of them took the same ride more than once. The movement time from one ride to
another is negligible, and a visitor leaves the ride immediately after the completion of the ride.
No one takes a break inside the park unless mentioned explicitly.

The following information is also known.

1. Chitra never waited in the queue and completed her visit by 11 am after spending Rs. 50 to
pay for the ticket(s).
2. Anjali took Ride-1 at 11 am after waiting for 30 mins for Chitra to complete it. It was the
only ride where Anjali waited.
3. Bipasha began her first of three rides at 11:30 am. All three visitors incurred the same
amount of ticket expense by 12:15 pm.
4. The last ride taken by Anjali and Bipasha was the same, where Bipasha waited 30 mins for
Anjali to complete her ride. Before standing in the queue for that ride, Bipasha took a 1-hour
coffee break after completing her previous ride.

SubQuestion No : 18
Q.18 Which ride was taken by all three visitors?
Ans 1. Ride-4

2. Ride-1

3. Ride-3

4. Ride-2

Question ID : 48916816257
Option 1 ID : 48916840653
Option 2 ID : 48916840650
Option 3 ID : 48916840652
Option 4 ID : 48916840651
Status : Answered
Chosen Option : 2