CLAT LLM 2025 Question Paper

Entrance Exam
2025

QUESTION
PAPER

PG 2025 Question Booklet No.

* 1. Name of Candidate :

2. Admit Card Number :

Instructions to Candidates
Duration of Test : 2 hours (120 minutes) Maximum Marks : 120
1. This Question Booklet (QB) contains 120 4. You should write the QB Number, and the
(One hundred and Twenty) Multiple Choice OMR Response Sheet Number, and sign in
Questions across 44 (Forty Four) pages the space/column provided in the Attendance
including 3 (Three) blank pages for rough Sheet.
work. No additional sheet(s) of paper will be 5. The QB for the Post Graduate Programme is
supplied for rough work. for 120 marks. Every Right Answer secures
2. You have to answer ALL questions in the 1 mark. Every Wrong Answer results in the
deduction of 0.25 mark. There shall be no

*
separate carbonised Optical Mark Reader
(OMR) Response Sheet supplied along deductions for Unanswered Questions.
with this QB. You must READ the detailed 6. You may retain the QB and the candidate’s
instructions provided with the OMR copy of the OMR Response Sheet after the
Response Sheet on the reverse side of this test.
packet Before you start the test.
7. The use of any unfair means shall result in
3. No clarification can be sought on the QB your disqualification. Possession of Electronic
from anyone. In case of any discrepancy Devices such as mobile phones, headphones,
such as printing error or missing pages, in digital watches etc., is/are strictly prohibited
the QB, request the Invigilator to replace the in the test premises. Impersonation or any
QB and OMR Response Sheet. Do not use other unlawful practice will lead to your
the previous OMR Response Sheet with the disqualification and possibly, appropriate
fresh QB. action under the law.

DO NOT OPEN TILL 2 P.M.

* 1

PG

I. Dominic Ongwen, a former commander of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) in Uganda, was
convicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in February 2021. The case marked a
significant milestone in international criminal law, focusing on issues of child soldiering,
forced marriage, and sexual and gender-based violence. Ongwen was found guilty of 61
* counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes, including murder, torture, enslavement,
forced marriage, rape, and conscription of children under the age of 15 into armed groups.
The ICC’s judgment emphasized the importance of accountability for leaders who exploit
children in conflicts and commit sexual and gender-based crimes.
A critical aspect of the judgment was the consideration of Ongwen’s own history as a child
soldier. Ongwen was abducted by the LRA at around the age of nine and was forced to
commit atrocities as he rose through the ranks. The court balanced this background against
the gravity of his crimes, ultimately ruling that his personal history did not absolve him of
responsibility for his actions as an adult commander. The judgment is also notable for its
comprehensive approach to reparations for victims. The ICC ordered collective reparations,
including symbolic measures like memorials, physical and psychological rehabilitation,
and financial compensation to support the victims and their communities. This case
reinforces the ICC’s commitment to addressing serious international crimes, particularly
those involving vulnerable populations such as children and women and underscores the
principles of justice and reparation in international criminal law.
(This extract is taken from Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen (ICC, 2021))

1. Which principle of international criminal law ensures that individuals, regardless of
their position or rank, can be held accountable for committing serious international
crimes?
(A) Sovereign immunity (B) Command responsibility
(C) Diplomatic immunity (D) Universal jurisdiction

2. In the context of international criminal law, what does the principle of “individual
criminal responsibility” entail?
(A) Only states can be held accountable for international crimes
(B) Individuals can be held personally liable for committing war crimes, crimes against
humanity, and genocide
(C) Individuals are immune from prosecution if they act under state orders
(D) Only military personnel can be held responsible for international crimes

3. The concept of “crimes against humanity” includes which of the following acts, as
exemplified in the Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen case?
(A) Piracy and terrorism
(B) Enslavement, forced marriage, and sexual violence
(C) Espionage and sabotage
(D) Intellectual property theft

3 *

PG

4. What is the significance of the principle of “complementarity” in the context of the
International Criminal Court (ICC)?
(A) The ICC can prosecute cases only when national jurisdictions are unwilling or
unable to do so
(B) The ICC has primary jurisdiction over all international crimes
(C) The ICC can only prosecute crimes committed within its member states
(D) The ICC shares jurisdiction equally with national courts

5. Which of the following statements best describes the significance of the Prosecutor v.
Dominic Ongwen case in the context of international criminal law?
(A) It was the first case to address environmental crimes in international conflicts
(B) It marked a milestone in addressing sexual and gender-based violence and the
exploitation of children in armed conflicts
(C) It was the first case to involve cybercrimes committed by international armed
groups
(D) It primarily focused on the financial aspects of running an armed group

II. The landmark judgment of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa
& Others, delivered by the Supreme Court of India in 1978, significantly influenced the
interpretation of the term ‘industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The case
cantered on whether the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board, a statutory body,
could be classified as an industry under the Act, thereby making its employees eligible for
certain protections and benefits. Prior to this case, the definition of ‘industry’ had been
subject to varied interpretations, leading to confusion and inconsistency in its application.
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, broadly defined ‘industry’ to include any business, trade,
undertaking, manufacture, or calling of employers and any calling, service, employment,
handicraft, or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen. However, this expansive
definition left room for ambiguity, especially concerning statutory bodies and non-profit
organizations. In this case, the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board argued that
it was not an industry, emphasizing its statutory duties and public welfare objectives.
The Board contended that its primary purpose was to provide essential services, not
to engage in profit-making activities typical of private enterprises. On the other hand,
the respondents, including A. Rajappa, argued that the Board’s activities fell within the
scope of an industry as defined by the Act, and thus, its employees should be entitled to
the benefits and protections accorded to workers in industries. The Supreme Court, in its
judgment, undertook a comprehensive analysis of the term ‘industry.’ The bench, led by
Chief Justice M. Hameedullah Beg, laid down a broad and inclusive definition of ‘industry.’
The Court asserted that what mattered was the nature of the activity and the relationship
between the employer and the employees. This interpretation aimed to ensure that a wide
range of workers, including those employed in public utility services, statutory bodies,
and even some non-profit organizations, would be covered under the protective umbrella
of the Industrial Disputes Act. The decision in Bangalore Water Supply v. A. Rajappa

* 4

PG

& Others had far-reaching implications. It extended the scope of labour protections to a
broader spectrum of workers, ensuring that more employees could benefit from the dispute
resolution mechanisms and other safeguards provided under the Industrial Disputes Act.
This judgment underscored the judiciary’s role in interpreting labour laws to promote social
justice and protect workers’ rights in a rapidly industrializing nation.
(Extract from Bangalore Water Supply v. A. Rajappa & Others, 1978 2 SCC)

6. According to the Supreme Court’s judgment, what is the most important factor in
determining whether an activity constitutes an industry?
(A) The profit-making motive of the employer
(B) When there are multiple activities carried on by an establishment, its dominant
function has to be considered. If the dominant function is not commercial, benefits
of a workman of an industry under Industrial Dispute Act may be given
(C) The nature of the activity and the authority of the employer over its employees
(D) When there are multiple activities carried on by an establishment, all the activities
must be considered. Even if one activity is commercial, the employees will not get
the benefit of workman of an industry under the Industrial Dispute Act

7. Which of the following best describes the broader impact of the judgment?
(A) It reduced labour protections for workers
(B) It extended labour protections to a broader spectrum of workers
(C) It had no significant impact on labour laws
(D) It only affected private sector workers

8. Which of the following best describes the term ‘industry’ as defined by the Supreme
Court in this judgment?
(A) Any activity involving profit-making
(B) Any systematic activity organized by cooperation between an employer and
employees for producing or distributing goods and services
(C) Only activities conducted by private enterprises
(D) Activities limited to manufacturing sectors

9. In which of the following landmark judgement, the Supreme Court held that when an
association or society of apartment owners employs workers for personal services to its
members, those workers do not qualify as workmen under the Act and the association
is not an “Industry” under the Industrial Disputes Act?
(A) Som Vihar Apartment Owners’ Housing Maintenance Society Ltd. v. Workmen,
2009 SC
(B) Anand Vihar Apartment Owners’ Society Ltd. v. Workmen, 2024 SC
(C) Kanchanjunga Building Employees Union v. Kanchanjunga Flat Owners Society
& Anr., 2024 SC
(D) None of the above

5 *

PG

10. Under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, what is the role of the “Works Committee”
and which of the following correctly describes its function?

(A) The Works committee is a body formed by the Central government to address
wage disputes between employer and employee in public sector industries

(B) The Works committee is a grievance redressal body constituted by the employer,
primarily to promote measures for securing and preserving amity and good
relations between the employer and employee

(C) The Works Committee is responsible for making binding decisions on industrial
disputes related to layoffs, retrenchment and closure of industrial units

(D) All of the above

III. For a principle to be acceptable as a law, Lon Fuller states that it must be measured in
terms of the following eight standards: (1) The principle must be expounded in a manner
so that it can be generally applied. A pattern less ad hoc system of law lacks the desired
“internal morality” which legal principles should possess. This proposition is comparable
to the often-read statement that our government is a government of laws rather than men.
(2) The mandates of the law must be communicated to the people to whom they are directed.
(3) Newly announced principles of law, except on rare occasions, should be applied only in a
prospective manner. Retroactive application of changes in prescribed norms, subject to the
presence of compelling extenuating circumstances, should be avoided. (4) Standards of action
and inaction should be clearly stated. Fuller concedes that the lawmaker cannot specify
with absolute clarity exactly what is demanded of each individual in every instance when
the law may affect him. He does, however, assert that the duty to clarify the law should be
delegated to the enforcement bodies only to the extent that such action is required by the
environment in which the law must operate. (5) Arguing that respect for the law calls for
consistency, Fuller maintains that the originators of laws should take great pains to see
that the body of law is as free as possible from contradictory mandates, (6) Emphasizing
that law is tied to the capabilities of human beings, Fuller insists that those who prescribe
the norms required of individuals must refrain from imposing impossible standards of
action or inaction. A stated norm which demands an absurd course of action would violate
Fuller’s idea of the “internal morality of law.” (7) While stare decisis, of recent date, has
been viewed by some, if not many people, as a barrier on the pathways to needed change,
Fuller is of the opinion that abiding by previously announced norms is desirable in and of
itself. He finds that frequency of change, by its very nature, tends to have a deleterious
impact upon the persons who are subjected to an abrupt alteration of the requirements
which the law imposes upon them. (8) The student of American history is familiar with
Andrew Jackson’s assertion to the effect that while the Supreme Court might render a
judgment, it lacked the means by which it might be implemented.
[Extracted from Tucker, Edwin W. (1965) “The Morality of Law, by Lon L. Fuller,” Indiana
Law Journal: Vol. 40: Iss. 2, Article5.]

* 6

PG

11. What does Fuller refer to with the term “promulgation”?
(A) The retroactive application of laws
(B) The consistent application of laws
(C) The clear communication of laws to those they affect
(D) The economic impact of laws

12. Which of the following best describes the central issue in the Hart-Fuller debate?
(A) The influence of morality on state
(B) Whether law and morality are inherently connected
(C) The role of judges in interpreting morality
(D) The influence of religious values on legal system

13. What was Lon Fuller’s main criticism of Hart’s legal positivism?
(A) It ignores moral obligations of a judge to make decisions on ethics
(B) It places too much emphasis on legal rules without considering their moral
implication
(C) It ignores the role of international law in shaping domestic legal systems
(D) All of the above

14. Why does Fuller argue that legal standards should be free from contradictions?
(A) To allow for greater judicial discretion
(B) To ensure laws are adaptable to different situations
(C) To maintain respect for the law and ensure consistency
(D) To simplify legal education

15. Which of the following best describes the concept of “internal morality” in law according
to Lon Fuller?
(A) Law should be flexible and adaptive to individual circumstances
(B) Law should be explained with clarity and precision
(C) Law should prioritize economic efficiency
(D) Law should be created by popular vote

IV. SEBI was established as India’s principal capital markets regulator with the aim to protect
the interest of investors in securities and promote the development and regulation of the
securities market in India. SEBI is empowered to regulate the securities market in India
by the SEBI Act 1992, the SCRA and the Depositories Act 1996. SEBI’s powers to regulate
the securities market are wide and include delegated legislative, administrative, and
adjudicatory powers to enforce SEBI’s regulations. SEBI exercises its delegated legislative
power by inter alia framing regulations and appropriately amending them to keep up with
the dynamic nature of the securities’ market. SEBI has issued a number of regulations on
various areas of security regulation which form the backbone of the framework governing
the securities market in India.

7 *

PG

Section 11 of the SEBI Act lays down the functions of SEBI and expressly states that it
“shall be the duty of the Board to protect the interests of investors in securities and to
promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market, by such measures as
it thinks fit”. Further, Section 30 of the SEBI Act empowers SEBI to make regulations
consistent with the Act. Significantly, while framing these regulations, SEBI consults its
advisory committees consisting of domain experts, including market experts, leading market
players, legal experts, technology experts, retired Judges of this Court or the High Courts,
academicians, representatives of industry associations and investor associations. During
the consultative process, SEBI also invites and duly considers comments from the public
on their proposed regulations. SEBI follows similar consultative processes while reviewing
and amending its regulations.
(Extracted, with edits and revision, from the judgement in Vishal Tiwari v. Union of India,
[2024] 1 S.C.R. 171)

16. Which of the following is not a committee setup by SEBI?
(A) Technical Advisory Committee
(B) Competition Advisory Committee
(C) Intermediary Advisory Committee
(D) Market Data Advisory Committee

17. Which among the following is not a function of SEBI?
(A) regulating substantial acquisition of shares and takeover of companies
(B) prohibiting and regulating self-regulatory organisations
(C) prohibiting insider trading in securities
(D) promoting investors education and training of intermediaries of securities
markets

18. Match List I with List II.

List I List II
(Section of Securities and Exchange (Provision for)
Board of India Act, 1992)
A. Section 6 I. Offences by companies
B. Section 11 II. Power to make regulations
C. Section 27 III. Removal of member from office
D. Section 30 IV. Functions of Board

Choose the correct answer:
(A) A-I, B-III, C-II, D-IV (B) A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
(C) A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II (D) A-IV, B-II, C-III, D-I

* 8

PG

19. The process by which an organisation thinks about and evolves its relationships with
stakeholders for the common good, and demonstrates its commitment in this regard
by adoption of appropriate business processes and strategies is called
(A) Annual general meeting (B) Corporate social responsibility
(C) Issuing Shelf prospectus (D) Incorporation of a company

20. In which of the following cases did the court struck down the attempt of the government
to nationalise banks and pay minimal compensation to the shareholders?
(A) Shri Sunil Siddharthbhai Etc v. Union of India
(B) R.C. Cooper v. Union of India
(C) United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon & Ors
(D) Punjab National Bank v. Union of India
V. Vivian Bose, J., had observed that Section 106 of the Evidence Act is designed to meet certain
exceptional cases in which it would be impossible for the prosecution to establish certain
facts which are particularly within the knowledge of the accused. In Shambu Nath Mehra vs.
The State of Ajmer (1956 SCR 199) the learned Judge has stated the legal principle thus:
“This lays down the general rule that in a criminal case the burden of proof is on the
prosecution and section 106 is designed to meet certain exceptional cases in which it would
be impossible, or at any rate disproportionately difficult for the prosecution to establish
facts which are ‘especially’ within the knowledge of the accused and which he could prove
without difficulty or inconvenience. The word ‘especially’ underscores facts that are
pre-eminently or exceptionally within the knowledge of the accused. It added, if the section
were to be interpreted otherwise, it would lead to the very startling conclusion that in a
murder case the burden lies on the accused to prove that he did not commit the murder
because who could know better than him whether he did or did not.” It is evident that it
cannot be the intention and Privy Council has twice refused to construe this section, as
reproduced in certain other Acts outside India, to mean that the burden lies on the accused
person to show that he did not commit the crime for which he is tried. These cases are
Attygalle v. the King. 1936 PC 169 (AIR V 23) (A) and Seneviratne v. R, 1936-3 All ER 36
at p.49 (B). In case resting on circumstantial evidence, an accused person’s failure to
provide a reasonable explanation as required by S. 106 could serve as an additional link
in the chain of circumstances.
(Based on facts from State of West Bengal vs. Mir Mohammad Omar & Ors, AIR 2000
SUPREME COURT 2988)
21. Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, in cases where the burden of proof lies on
the prosecution, which of the following accurately reflects the relationship between
Section 101 and 106 of IEA, 1872?
(A) Section 106 is an exception to Section 101
(B) Section 106 is intended to relieve the prosecution of their duty to prove the case
beyond reasonable doubt under Section 101
(C) Both A and B
(D) Neither A nor B

9 *

PG

22. ‘Any person’ in Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act refers to:
(A) A party to the suit/proceeding
(B) A stranger to the suit/proceeding
(C) A witness
(D) None of the above

23. In which of the recent following cases, Supreme Court expounded the principles
relating to the applicability of S. 106 of Indian Evidence Act?
(A) Anees v. The State Govt. of NCT, 2024 SC
(B) Anita v. NCT of Delhi, 2024 SC
(C) Abhay v. Union of India, 2024 SC
(D) Anish v. The State Govt. of NCT, 2024 SC

24. What is the phrase “Presumptions are like bats, flitting in the twilight but disappearing
in the sunshine of facts” indicate?
(A) Presumption shifts the burden of proof to the party against whom the presumption
operates, but the burden shifts back to the original party once rebutting facts are
presented
(B) Presumption is a substantive piece of evidence and it completely relieve the
prosecution of its burden of proof, as longs as the presumption is established in
the beginning of the trial
(C) There are different categories of presumptions and the highest degree of
presumption shifts the burden of proof permanently to the accused, who must
disprove the presumption beyond reasonable doubt
(D) Presumptions are irrefutable facts that, once established, cannot be negated by
evidence brought forth in the case

25. Which of the theories emanate from Section 106 of Indian Evidence Act?
1. Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitor
2. Theory of reverse burden of proof
3. Doctrine of last seen together
4. Presumption of innocence
Select the correct option:
(A) 1 and 2 (B) 2 and 3
(C) 3 and 4 (D) 1 and 4

* 10

PG

VI. In Kapilaben v. Ashok Kumar Jayantilal Sheth, (2020) 20 SCC 648, the Supreme Court
has considered that the assignment of a contract might result in a transfer of either rights
or obligations thereunder. The transfer of obligations is not possible without the consent of
the other party. However, the transfer of rights is permissible, except in cases where the
* contract is of a personal nature. “It is well-settled that the term ‘representative-in-interest’
includes the assignee of a contractual interest. Though the provisions of the Contract Act
do not particularly deal with the assignability of contracts, the court has opined time and
again that a party to a contract cannot assign their obligations or liabilities without the
consent of the other party. A Constitution Bench in Khardah Co. Ltd. v. Raymon & Co.
(India) (P) Ltd. [AIR 1962 SC 1810], has laid out this principle as follows: “An assignment
of a contract might result by transfer either of the rights or of the obligations thereunder.
However, there is a well-recognised distinction between these two classes of assignments.
As a rule, obligations under a contract cannot be assigned except with the consent of the
promisee, and when such consent is given, it is really a novation resulting in substitution
of liabilities. On the other hand, rights under a contract are assignable unless the contract
is personal in its nature or the rights are incapable of assignment either under the law or
under an agreement between the parties.”

[Extracted with edits from Indira Devi v. Veena Gupta, (2023) 8 SCC 124]

26. ‘A’, the absolute owner, with the consent of his family members, executed a conditional
sale deed in favour of his tenant. The conditional sale deed contained a clause
empowering the vendors to repurchase the property within seven years on repayment
of the sale consideration. Which of the following statements regarding the agreement
is true?
(A) The agreement is invalid
(B) The agreement is not valid because a conditional sale deed containing a clause
for repurchase cannot be executed
(C) The agreement is not valid because the time period provided for repurchase by
the vendor is very long, i.e., seven years
(D) The agreement is valid

27. Which of the following is correct regarding the assignability of the contract?
(a) The assignment of contracts is expressly governed by the provisions outlined in
Sections 130 to 137 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
(b) A party to a contract can transfer his liabilities under the contract without the
consent of the other party
(c) A party to a contract cannot transfer his liabilities under the contract without
the consent of the other party
(d) Transfer of obligation can be made to anyone without permission of anyone

11 *

PG

28. Who among the following is not ‘representative-in-interest’ for the purpose of obtaining
specific performance?
(A) The person to whom the interest in the contract is transferred for a valuable
consideration
(B) The person to whom the interest in the contract devolves by succession
(C) The person to whom the interest in contract is gifted by a gift deed
(D) Rank trespasser, as an intermeddler

29. Consider the following statements:
I. The benefit of a contract is assignable in ‘cases where it can make no difference to
the person on whom the obligation lies to which of two persons, he is to discharge
it’
II. A contract which is such that the promisor must perform it in person, viz. involving
personal considerations or personal skill or qualifications (such as his credit), are
by their nature not assignable
III. The contractual rights for the payment of money or to building work do not involve
personal considerations and are not contracts of a personal nature
Choose the correct answer:
(A) I and II are correct
(B) II and III are correct
(C) Only III is correct
(D) I, II and III are correct

30. Consider the following statements:
I. Where a party to the contract has obtained substituted performance of the contract
as per law, such contract is not specifically enforceable
II. A contract, the performance of which involves the performance of a continuous
duty which the court cannot supervise, is not specifically enforceable
III. After the Amendment Act of 2018, a contract for non-performance for which
compensation is an adequate relief is not specifically enforceable
Choose the correct answer:
(A) All are correct (B) I and II are correct
(C) II and III are correct (D) Only II is correct

VII. In the present case, the levy of IGST on the supply of ocean freight services under the reverse
charge mechanism on the importer, when the value of such service is already included in
the transaction value of imported goods, amounts to double taxation. The concept of double
taxation implies that the same subject matter is taxed twice when it should be taxed only
once. The GST law, as framed, does not envisage taxation of a transaction twice, and the
fundamental principles of GST do not support such an imposition. Further, the importer,
who is not the recipient of the service but is treated as a deemed recipient under the reverse

* 12

PG

charge mechanism, cannot be made liable to pay tax on a service that they have not directly
availed. This stretches the scope of reverse charge mechanism beyond its intended purpose,
which is to simplify tax collection by shifting the liability to pay tax from the service provider
to the service recipient, particularly in cases where the service provider is located outside
India and does not have a presence within the taxable territory. Moreover, the constitutional
framework requires that a tax should be levied with legislative competence and should not
contravene any fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. The imposition
of IGST on ocean freight under the reverse charge mechanism without proper legislative
backing undermines the very essence of taxation principles enshrined in the Constitution
of India.

(This extract is taken from Mohit Minerals v. Union of India CA No. 1390/2022)

31. According to the Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India judgment, what constitutes
double taxation in the context of GST on ocean freight?
(A) Taxing both the importer and the exporter for the same service
(B) Tax not payable on ocean freight under the RCM for CIF imports
(C) Taxing the service provider and the service recipient for the same service
(D) Taxing the importer for both the goods and the services separately

32. Assertion (A): The importer should not be liable to pay GST on ocean freight under
the reverse charge mechanism if they are not the direct recipient of the service.
Reason (R): The reverse charge mechanism is intended to shift the tax burden from
service providers located outside India to the service recipients within India.
(A) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
(B) Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(C) A is true, but R is false
(D) A is false, but R is true

33. Consider the following statements regarding the Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. v. Union
of India judgment:
1. The Supreme Court ruled that imposing GST on ocean freight charges under the
reverse charge mechanism leads to double taxation
2. The importer, not being the direct recipient of the service, should not be liable to
pay GST on ocean freight
3. The judgment emphasized that tax laws must have proper legislative backing to
prevent contravention of fundamental rights
Which of the statements given above are correct?
(A) 1 and 2 only (B) 1 and 3 only
(C) 2 and 3 only (D) 1, 2 and 3

13 *

PG

34. Consider the following statements:
1. The reverse charge mechanism shifts the tax liability from the service provider
to the service recipient
2. The principle of single taxation was violated by imposing GST on ocean freight
charges already included in the cost of imported goods
3. The judgment clarified that importers can be liable for GST on services directly
availed by them
Which of the statements given above are correct?
(A) 1 and 2 only (B) 1 and 3 only
(C) 2 and 3 only (D) 1, 2 and 3

35. According to the judgment, what is the constitutional requirement for levying a
tax?
(A) The tax should be easy to administer
(B) The tax should have legislative competence and not contravene fundamental
rights
(C) The tax should be progressive in nature
(D) The tax should only apply to domestic transactions

VIII. Whether an agreement is a mortgage by conditional sale or sale with an option to repurchase
is a vexed question to be considered in the facts of each case. The essentials of an agreement,
to qualify as a mortgage by conditional sale, can succinctly be summarized. An ostensible
sale with transfer of possession and ownership, but containing a clause for reconveyance
in accordance with Section 58(c) of the Act, will clothe the agreement as a mortgage by
conditional sale. Referring to Section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act the observed,
“A deeming fiction was added in the negative that a transaction shall not be deemed to be a
mortgage unless the condition for reconveyance is contained in the document which purports
to effect the sale.” The issue under adjudication was whether the transaction between the
parties was an absolute sale of the property or it was a mortgage. The court relied upon
the case Bishwanath Prasad Singh v. Rajendra Prasad and Anr, 2006 SC and held that
A bare perusal of the said provision clearly shows that a mortgage by conditional sale
must be evidenced by one document whereas a sale with condition of retransfer may
be evidenced by more than one document. A sale with a condition of retransfer is not a
mortgage. It is not a partial transfer. By reason of such a transfer all rights have been
transferred reserving only a personal right to the purchaser and such a personal right would
be lost unless the same is exercised within the stipulated time. The execution of separate
agreement for reconveyance, either contemporaneously or subsequently, shall militate
against the agreement being mortgaged by conditional sale. There must exist a debtor and
creditor relationship. The valuation of the property, and the transaction value, along with
the duration of time for reconveyance, are important considerations to decide the nature
of the agreement. There will have to be a cumulative consideration of these factors, along

* 14

PG

with the recitals in the agreement, intention of the parties, coupled with other attendant
circumstances, considered in a holistic manner. The language used in the agreement may
not always be conclusive.

(Extract from Prakash (Dead) By LR. V. G. Aradhya & Ors, 2023 SC)

36. The proper remedy for the mortgagee in a mortgage by conditional sale is:
(A) to institute a suit for sale
(B) to suit for recovery of money
(C) to institute a suit for foreclosure
(D) Both (A) and (B)

37. One of the conditions of mortgage by conditional sale is that:
(A) on payment of mortgage money, the sale shall be voidable
(B) on payment of mortgage money, the sale shall become void
(C) the mortgagee shall receive the rent and profits and will appropriate the same
towards the dues
(D) All of the above

38. What is the common clause between mortgage by conditional sale and English
mortgage?
(A) Transfer of ownership of mortgaged property
(B) Transfer of possession of mortgaged property
(C) The right of mortgagee to sell the property
(D) Delivery of documents of title

39. What is the limitation period in case of mortgage by conditional sale?
(A) 3 years (B) 12 years
(C) 30 years (D) No time limit

40. Which of the following expresses the distinction between a mortgage by conditional
sale and a sale with a condition of repurchase?
(A) In a mortgage the debt subsists and a right to redeem remains with the debtor,
but a sale with a condition of repurchase is not a lending and borrowing
arrangement
(B) In a mortgage by conditional sale, generally the amount of consideration is far
below the value of the property in the market, but in a sale with a condition of
repurchase, the amount of consideration is generally equal to or close to the value
of the property
(C) Both (A) and (B)
(D) Neither (A) nor (B)

15 *

PG

IX. “The power to pardon is a part of the constitutional scheme, and we have no doubt, in our
mind, that it should be so treated also in the Indian Republic. It has been reposed by the
people through the Constitution in the Head of the State, and enjoys high status. It is a
constitutional responsibility of great significance, to be exercised when occasion arises in
accordance with the discretion contemplated by the context. It is not denied, and indeed
it has been repeatedly affirmed in the course of argument by learned counsels appearing
for the Petitioner that the power to pardon rests on the advice tendered by the Executive
to the President, who subject to the provisions of Art. 74(1) of the Constitution, must act
in accordance with such advice......”

We are of the view that it is open to the President in the exercise of the power vested in
him by Art. 72 of the Constitution to scrutinise the evidence on the record of the criminal
case and come to a different conclusion from that recorded by the court in regard to the
guilt of, and sentence imposed on the accused. In doing so, the President does not amend or
modify or supersede the judicial record. The judicial record remains intact, and undisturbed.
The President acts in a wholly different plane from that in which the Court acted. He acts
under a constitutional power, the nature of which is entirely different from the judicial
power and cannot be regarded as an extension of it. This is so, notwithstanding that the
practical effect of the Presidential act is to remove the stigma of guilt from the accused or
to remit the sentence imposed on him.

It is apparent that the power under Art. 72 entitles the President to examine the record of
evidence of the criminal case and to determine for himself whether the case is one deserving
the grant of the relief falling within that power. We are of opinion that the President is
entitled to go into the merits of the case notwithstanding that it has been judicially concluded
by the consideration given to it by this Court. In Kehar Singh v. Union of India, 1989 SC,
this court stated that the same obviously means that the affected party need not be given
the reasons. The question whether reasons can or cannot be disclosed to the Court when the
same is challenged was not the subject-matter of consideration. In any event, the absence
of any obligation to convey the reasons does not mean that there should not be legitimate
or relevant reasons for passing the order.

[Extract from the judgment of Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India 2014 (3) SCC 1]

41. Which one of the following statements is correct with respect to the granting of pardon
by the President?
(A) The power to grant pardon is a constitutional duty. Hence, judicial review is
available, just as any executive action
(B) Granting pardon being the privilege of the President, no judicial review is available
against the decision of the President in granting or refusing to grant a pardon
(C) The constitution expressly conferred the power to grant pardon to the President
hence, the President is not bound to rely on the aid advice of the executive
(D) The President’s power to grant pardon can be reviewed on the grounds of
non-application of mind

* 16

PG

42. In the above case the Supreme Court held that a minimum period of _______days be
stipulated between the receipt of communication of the rejection of the mercy petition
and the scheduled date of execution.
(A) 15 (B) 30
(C) 14 (D) No such time was fixed

43. What is not true about Art. 21 of Constitution of India?
(A) Insanity is not a relevant supervening factor for commutation of death
sentence
(B) Right to life of a person continues till his last breath and that Court will protect
that right even if the noose is being tied on the condemned person’s neck
(C) The anguish of alternating hope and despair, the agony of uncertainty and the
consequence of such suffering on the mental, emotional and physical integrity
and health violates Art. 21 of the prisoners
(D) Art. 21 is a substantive right and not merely procedural

44. In which case, the Supreme Court held that if the crime is brutal and heinous
and involves the killing of a large number of innocent people without any reason,
delay cannot be the sole factor for the commutation of the death sentence to life
imprisonment?
(A) Devender Pal Singh Bhullar v. State (NCT) of Delhi
(B) V. Sriharan Murugan v. Union of India
(C) Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. State of Maharashtra
(D) Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India

45. The President’s power to grant a pardon
(A) Can be delegated to the Council of Ministers
(B) Cannot be delegated as it is an essential legislative function
(C) Cannot be delegated as it is expressly conferred on the President
(D) Can be delegated to the Vice-president in the absence of the President

X. The Indian Contract Act is a classical model of contract law that covers various codes that
govern general contracts as well as specific contracts. Contract of Bailment, one such type
of contract under the Indian law of contract, talks about the delivery of goods from one
person to another for a purpose. Under this contract, the bailee is given a right to lien.
Right to lien is defined under Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which talks
about the general right to lien of bankers, wharfingers, factors, attorneys of high courts
and policy brokers.
Generally, two parties are involved. The banker who lends money to the borrower or the
customer, who then provides a security in exchange for the loan. Both parties are entitled
to some of the rights that are associated with the securities that were provided. It is a
possessory right which allows the bank to have temporary possession of the goods until

17 *

PG

the customer’s outstanding debt is paid. The banker the right to act as the trustee of the
property as long as they are acting within their powers as the custodian and do not sell
the property without giving notice to the customer. The landmark judgment of Syndicate
Bank v. Vijay Kumar and Others dealt with the issue of whether or not a banker’s right
to lien and set off was a general and customary right guaranteed to them. In furtherance
of Halsbury’s laws of England, this judgment recognised the banker’s right to general lien
was a right guaranteed by the law and not the contract.
(Extracted with edits from “Critical Analysis of Bankers Right of General Lien” by Alisha
Khalid Bhendwade, IJLRA, Vol. II, 2024)

46. Who among the following can exercise right to General Lien in the absence of any
provision in the contract?
i. Factors
ii. Brokers
iii. Wharfingers
iv. Attorneys
(A) iv (B) iv and ii (C) i and iii (D) All of them

47. The Bailee’s right to retain the goods until he receives due remuneration for the
services, he has rendered in respect of them is known as:
(A) Particular Lien (B) General Lien
(C) Particular Retention (D) General Retention

48. With respect to bailment, a Banker:
(A) Has a right to a particular lien on fixed deposits
(B) Has a right to a general lien on fixed deposits
(C) Has a right to a general lien on savings account
(D) Has no right to a lien on a savings account or fixed deposits

49. Which one of the following is not an essential characteristic of Bailment?
(A) Physical delivery of goods
(B) Delivery of goods for some purpose
(C) After the purpose is accomplished, the goods must be returned
(D) Goods may be returned to the owner or otherwise disposed of according to the
directions of the person delivering them

50. Which one of the following are bailments?
i. Hiring a Locker facility in a Bank
ii. Taking a Gold loan from the Bank
iii. Hypothecation of the vehicle for loan to the Bank
iv. Giving car for valet parking
(A) iv (B) iv and ii (C) i and iii (D) All of them

* 18

PG

XI. Article 21 of the Constitution states that no person shall be deprived of his liberty except
in accordance with procedure established by law. Conversely, we think that a person is
entitled to the protection of his liberty only in accordance with law. When a person’s liberty
cannot be violated in breach of a law, can a person’s liberty be protected even in the face of
a breach or violation of law? In other words, should rule of law prevail over personal liberty
of a person or vice-versa? Further, should this Court weigh in favour of a person’s freedom
and liberty even when it has been established that the same was granted in violation of
law? Should the scales of justice tilt against rule of law? We wish to make it clear that
only when rule of law prevails will liberty and all other fundamental rights would prevail
under our Constitution including the right to equality and equal protection of law as
enshrined in Article 14 thereof. Justice Nagarathna, who authored the judgement, began
her pronouncement by invoking classical Greek Philosopher Plato. “Punishment is to be
inflicted not for the sake of vengeance but for the sake of prevention and reformation. In his
treatise, Plato reasons that the lawgiver, as far as he can, ought to imitate the doctor who
does not apply his drug with a view to pain only, but to do the patient good. This curative
theory of punishment likens penalty to medicine administered for the sake of the one being
chastised. Thus, if a criminal is curable, he ought to be improved by education and other
suitable arts and the set free as a better citizen and less of a burden to the state. This
postulate lies at the heart of the policy of remission.” Having said that, she also pointed out
the competing interests involved, of the rights of the victim’s family to justice and the right
of the convicts to a second chance by remission or reduction of their sentence. She added,
“A woman deserves respect howsoever high or low she may otherwise be considered in the
society or whatever faith she may follow or whatever creed she may belong to. Can heinous
crime against women permit remission of the convicts by a reduction in their sentence and
by granting them liberty?”

(This extract has been taken from Bilkis Yakoob Rasul v. Union of India (2024) 5 SCC 481)

51. On which grounds remission can be denied?
(A) On the discretion of the appropriate government
(B) On the central government’s discretion
(C) On the state government’s discretion
(D) None of the above

52. Which of the following is not related to remission?
(A) State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Prem Raj, 2003 7 SCC
(B) Sarat Chandra Rabha v. Khagendranath, AIR 1961 SC 334
(C) Both (A) and (B)
(D) Neither (A) nor (B)

19 *

PG

53. Which of the following needs to be considered while entertaining an application for
remission under the provisions of Cr.P.C., 1973?
(A) The application for remission under Section 432 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 could be
only before the Government of the State within whose territorial jurisdiction
the applicant was convicted (appropriate Government) and not before any other
Government within whose territorial jurisdiction the applicant may have been
transferred on conviction or where the offence has occurred
(B) A consideration for remission must be by way of an application under Section 432 of
the Cr.P.C., 1973 which has to be made by the convict or on his behalf. In the first
instance whether there is compliance with Section 433A of the Cr.P.C., 1973 must
be noted in as much as a person serving a life sentence cannot seek remission
unless fourteen years of imprisonment has been completed
(C) Both (A) and (B)
(D) Only (A)

54. According to Section 432 (2) of Cr.P.C. when deciding on an application for remission,
the government may seek the opinion of the presiding judge. In Bilkis Bano Case,
how did the court interpret the expression “may” regarding the government’s duty to
seek the opinion of the judge?
(A) The expression “may” indicate that it is optional for the government to seek the
opinion of the presiding judge
(B) The expression “may” mean that government can seek the opinion of any judge,
not necessarily the presiding judge
(C) The expression “may” must be interpreted as “shall”, making it mandatory for
the government to seek the opinion of the presiding judge
(D) The expression “may” allow the presiding judge to refuse providing an opinion
on the application for remission

55. In Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the provision for commutation of a
sentence of imprisonment of life has replaced the term ‘not exceeding fourteen years
or of fine’ of the Cr.P.C. with:
(A) not less than seven years (B) not less than ten years
(C) not more than twenty years (D) seven years

XII. The Supreme Court recently examined the interplay between Section 47 of the Registration
Act, 1908 and Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Section 47 of the Registration
Act titled “time from which registered document operates” states that registered document
shall operate from the time from which it would have commenced to operate if no registration
has been required or made. On the other hand, Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act
provides that the transfer of immovable property of value above Rs. 100 can be made only
by a registered document. It is a trite law that a transfer of immovable property by way

* 20

PG

of sale can only be made by a deed of conveyance and in the absence of such deed that is
duly stamped and registered as required by law, no right, title or interest in the immovable
property can be transferred. The Court referred to an earlier decision in Ram Saran Lall
v. Domini Kuer where a harmonious balance was maintained between the peremptory
language of Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act and the deeming fiction under
Section 47 of the registration act. It also implicitly recognised that Section 54 draws a clear
distinction between transfer of tangible immovable property of value more Rs. 100 and
less than Rs. 100. In the former case, such transfer can only be made through a registered
instrument, whereas in the latter case the transfer may be either by registered instrument
or by delivery of property.
(Extract from Kanwar Raj Singh v. Gejo, 2024 SC)

56. Which of the following is the effect of non-registration of a compulsorily registrable
document?
(A) The unregistered document cannot be adduced in evidence of any transaction
affecting such property
(B) As long as the terms, grant or disposition is in writing and fulfils the criteria of
S. 91 of the Indian Evidence Act, it will be admitted as evidence
(C) Procedure is a handmaid of justice and registration is merely a procedural
requirement. Non registration does not make the document less admissible in
court
(D) The unregistered document can be adduced in evidence if the party adducing it
is able to prove its bonafide

57. A property from one person to the other can be transferred by way of:
(A) Court sale, gift, will, inheritance, relinquishment
(B) Dedication, gift, will, inheritance, relinquishment
(C) Private or court sale, gift, will, inheritance, relinquishment, dedication
(D) Private or court sale, gift, will, inheritance

58. Where the member of the family agrees to divide the property amongst themselves,
not necessarily in accordance with the quantum as specified in law or according to
their entitlement. It can take into its fold non-family members as well. Once effected,
it is binding on all the members who were parties to it and is enforceable?

This division is called:
(A) Transfer of property under the Transfer of Property Act
(B) Partition of joint Hindu Family
(C) Family Arrangement
(D) Partition in Interested parties

21 *

PG

59. Property and interest in the property as general rule are transferable. This rule of
transferability is based on the maxim:
(A) Alienation rei praefertur juri accrescendi
(B) Cuius est solum eius est usque ad coelum et usque ad infernos
(C) Res nullius
(D) Nemo dat quod non habet

60. In a given case where a sale deed is executed and entire agreed consideration is paid
on or before execution of sale deed, after it is registered, it will operate from:
(A) Date of registration of the sale deed
(B) Date of execution of the sale deed
(C) Date on communication of proposal was complete
(D) None of the above

XIII. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked for protecting the Great Indian Bustard
and the Lesser Florican, both of whom are on the verge of extinction. India faces a
number of pressing near term challenges that directly impact the right to a healthy
environment, particularly for vulnerable and indigenous communities including forest
dwellers. The lack of reliable electricity supply for many citizens not only hinders economic
development but also disproportionately affects communities, including women and
low-income households, further perpetuating inequalities. Therefore, the right to a healthy
environment encapsulates the principle that every individual has the entitlement to live
in an environment that is clean, safe, and conducive to their well-being. The promotion of
renewable energy sources plays a crucial role in promoting social equity by ensuring access
to clean and affordable energy of all segments of society, especially in rural and undeserved
areas. This contributes to poverty alleviation, enhances quality of life, and fosters inclusive
growth and development across the nation. Therefore, transitioning to renewable energy
is not just an environmental imperative but also a strategic investment in India’s future
prosperity, resilience and sustainability. The right to equality under Art. 14 and the right
to life under Art. 21 must be appreciated in the context of the decisions of this court, the
actions and commitments of the state on national and international level, and scientific
consensus on climate change and its adverse effects. By recognising the right to a healthy
environment, states are compelled to prioritise environmental protection and sustainable
development, thereby addressing the root cause of climate change and safeguarding the
well-being of present and future generations.
(Extract taken from MK Ranjitsinh and Ors v. Union of India, 2024 SC)
61. What is the objective of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC)?
(A) To enforce international environmental treaties on climate change at national
level
(B) To stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere to prevent dangerous
human-induced interference with climate change
(C) To stabilize carbon footprints and oversee global diversity protection efforts
(D) All of the above

* 22

PG

62. Which of the following Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) specifically addresses
climate change?
(A) SDG 31 (B) SDG 13 (C) SDG 12 (D) SDG 15

63. In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that any disturbance of the
basic environment elements namely air, water and soil, which are necessary for life,
would be hazardous to ‘life’ within the meaning of Article 21 of the Constitution of
India and Art. 48A and 51A(g) must be interpreted in the light of Article 21?
(A) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, 2000 SC
(B) M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath, 2000 SC
(C) Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India, 1996 SC
(D) M.C. Mehta v. Union Carbide Commission, 1991 SC

64. Which of the following statements are correct?
(A) The people of India do not have a right against the adverse effects of climate
change as pervious interpretations of Article 21 solely focussed on individual
freedoms and right to clean and pollution free environment
(B) Supreme Court for the first time recognized right to be free from adverse effects
of climate change in its recent judgement MK Ranjitsinh and Ors v. Union of
India, 2024 SC
(C) There is no separate recognition given by the Supreme Court for ‘right to be free
from adverse effects of climate change’ as it was already recognised under ‘right
to a clean environment’
(D) None of the Above

65. Which of the following protocol focusses at limiting global temperature rise by reducing
carbon emissions and combating climate change?
(A) The Montreal Protocol (B) The Kyoto Protocol
(C) The Paris Agreement (D) The Rio Declaration

XIV. As new situations arise; the law has to be evolved in order to meet the challenge of such
new situations. Law cannot afford to remain static. It should keep pace with changing
socio-economic norms. We have to evolve new principles and lay down new norms which
would adequately deal with the new problems which arise in a highly industrialized
economy. We cannot allow our judicial thinking to be constricted by reference to the law
as it prevails in England or for that matter in any other foreign country. We no longer
need the crutches of a foreign legal order. We are certainly prepared to receive light from
whatever source it comes but we have to build up our own jurisprudence and we cannot
countenance an argument that merely because the new law does not recognize the rule of
strict and absolute liability, we cannot have it too. Court should not feel inhibited by this

23 *

PG

rule merely because the new law does not recognise the rule of strict and absolute liability.
The enterprise must be held to be under an obligation to provide that the hazardous or
inherently dangerous activity in which it is engaged must be conducted with the highest
standards of safety. The court discussed the scope of the Epistolary jurisdiction and
reiterated that procedure being merely a handmaid of justice should not stand in the way
to access to justice.

(Extracted with edits from M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987) 1 SCC 395)

66. In which of the following cases, the term “Epistolary Jurisdiction” was first used in
India?
(A) Fertilizer Corporation Kamgar Union v. Union of India,1981 SC
(B) Mumbai Kamgar Sabha v. Abdul Bhai, 1976 SC
(C) ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, 1976 SC
(D) Amba Devi v. Union of India, 1984 SC

67. Which of the following offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) has a strict liability
connotation?
(A) Theft under Section 378 IPC
(B) Defamation under Section 499 IPC
(C) Bigamy under Section 494 IPC
(D) Selling adulterated food or drink under Section 272 IPC

68. “The Rule of Law is that the person who, for his own purpose, brings on his land and
collects and keeps there anything likely to do mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at
his peril: and if he does not do so is prima facie answerable for all the damage which
is the natural consequence of its escape”.

Above rule has been evolved by the:
(A) Lord Burrough (B) Justice Blackburn
(C) Lord Baron Diplock (D) None of the above

69. The rule of Rylands v. Fletcher is not applicable:
(A) When the escape is due to vis major or act of God
(B) When the damage is due to the wrongful or malicious act of a stranger
(C) When the escape is due to the plaintiff’s own fault
(D) All of the above

* 24

PG

70. In India the ‘Absolute Liability’ theory on the basis of injuries caused by the hazardous
industries was propounded by:
(A) V.R. Krishna Iyer, J. (B) P.N. Bhagwati, C.J.
(C) Kuldip Singh, J. (D) M.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J.

XV. International Organisations have had a significant impact on the development of
international law, effectively contributing to the establishment of a global constitutional
system. According to Henkin, international organisations “represent new laws at its birth,
for it is itself a child of law”. For instance, the Charter of the United Nations (UN) and its
specialised agencies and other international organisations have played a crucial role in
shaping international law. The World Health Organisation (WHO), the Organisation for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the International Labour Organisation
(ILO) are among the organisations that have contributed to the significant transformation of
international law sources, actors and processes over the past century. Since its establishment
with an initial membership of fifty-one states, UN has undergone significant development,
becoming a diverse and multidimensional global institution with a current membership of
193 nations. The UN has positioned itself as a global constitutional organisation, striving
to safeguard and uphold a minimal world order. Numerous experts in International Law
recognise the UN as a crucial international organisation for the maintenance of peace and
security.
(Rawa Almakky, “The Role of International Organisations in the Development of International
Law: An Analytical Assessment of the United Nations”, International Scientific Journal on
LAW and WORLD, Vol. 9 No. 28, 2023)

71. The Convention on International Civil Aviation is applicable only on:
(A) State Aircraft (B) Civil Aircraft
(C) War Aircraft (D) All of the above

72. Meaning of the Latin phrase ‘ex aequo et bono’ as in legal term, is:
(A) According to the equitable and good
(B) On the basis of equity and fairness
(C) Both (A) and (B)
(D) None of the above

73. The Economic and Social Council consists of 54 Members of the United Nations elected
by the General Assembly distributed as:
(A) African States and Asia Pacific States
(B) Eastern European, Western European and other States
(C) Latin American and Caribbean States
(D) All of the Above

25 *

PG

74. Under which Art. of UN Charter General Assembly may establish such subsidiary
organs as it deems necessary for the performance of its functions?
(A) Art. 19 of UN Charter (B) Art. 20 of UN Charter
(C) Art. 21 of UN Charter (D) Art. 22 of UN Charter

75. Article 21 of the Constitution of WHO, each Member has undertaken the obligation
to take action acceptance on Conventions adopted by:
(A) One third votes of the Health Assembly
(B) Two-third votes of the Health Assembly
(C) Special Majority means Three-Fourth votes of the Health Assembly
(D) All of the above

XVI. The Supreme Court affirmed that it is a well-established principle of administrative law
that an adjudicatory body cannot base its decision on any material unless the person against
whom it is sought to be utilized has been apprised of it and given an opportunity to respond
to it. The court noted from MP Jain & SN Jain’s treatise on Principles of Administrative
Law that if the adjudicatory body is going to rely on any material, evidence or document for
its decision against a party, then the same must be brought to his notice and he be given
an opportunity to rebut it or comment thereon. It is regarded as a fundamental principle
of natural justice that no material ought to be relied on against a party without giving
him an opportunity to respond to the same... The right to know the material on which
the authority is going to base its decision is an element of the right to defend oneself. If
without disclosing any evidence to the party, the authority takes it into its consideration,
and decides the matter against the party, then the decision is vitiated for it amounts to
denial of a real and effective opportunity to the party to meet the case against him.
On the issue of the impact of such non-disclosure the Court referred to its earlier
pronouncements and summarised the principles thus – A quasi-judicial authority has a
duty to disclose the material that has been relied upon at the stage of adjudication. The
actual test is whether the material that is required to be disclosed is relevant for purpose
of adjudication. If it is, then the principles of natural justice require its due disclosure.
The aggrieved person must be able to prove that prejudice has been caused to him due to
non-disclosure. To prove prejudice, he must prove that had the material been disclosed to
him the outcome or the punishment would have been different.
(Extract with Edits taken from in Deepak Ananda Patil v. State of Maharashtra, (2023) 11
SCC 130)

76. Which principle is applied in the judgment?
(A) Nemo judex in causa sua
(B) Audi alteram partem
(C) Ignorantia juris non excusat
(D) Jus necessitatis

* 26

PG

77. Non-Disclosure of material invalidates the order if:
(A) The authority has not relied on the material
(B) No prejudice is caused to the party
(C) The material was relevant for the purpose of adjudication
(D) The outcome would not have been any different if it was disclosed

78. ‘Real and effective opportunity’ in the context of this judgment refers to:
(A) Personal hearing
(B) Right to rebut the evidence supplied to the party
(C) Right to adduce evidence
(D) Right to know the evidence against oneself

79. Which of the following requires compliance with the rule of fair hearing?
(A) A notification bringing an Act into operation
(B) Price Control Order under Essential Commodities Act
(C) Notice issued by a Disciplinary Authority
(D) Reasoned Decision by competent authority

80. Which of the following statements is false?
(A) Proving prejudice to the party concerned is necessary to quash a quasi-judicial
order on the ground of non-disclosure of evidence
(B) Principles of natural justice do not have exceptions
(C) Speaking order is a third principle of natural justice
(D) Legal representation can be validly disallowed before a quasi-judicial
proceeding

XVII. Jurisprudence progresses as well as regresses. The late nineteenth-century analysis of
rights which Hohfeld brought to completion makes a notable advance in clarity. But rights
of each of the four Hohfeldian types are spoken of by Aquinas, as well as by the civilian
lawyers of his age (and indeed of earlier ages). The word ‘right’ translates the Latin ius or
jus, the root of the word’s ‘justice’, ‘jurist’, ‘juridical’, and ‘jurisprudence’. Though Aquinas
does not use the plural forms of the word ius as often as we use the plural ‘rights’, it is a
sheer mistake to claim, as some have, that he lacked or repudiated the concept of rights in
the modern sense, in which a right is ‘subjective’ in the sense of belonging to someone (the
subject of the right). When he defines justice as the steady willingness to give to others
what is theirs, Aquinas immediately goes on to treat that phrase as synonymous with
their right (ius suum); hence he treats a right/rights (ius/iura) as subjective. He also uses
the word to speak of ‘objective’ right, that is, what interpersonal action or relationship is
right-morally or legally, depending upon the context. Hobbes, who got inspired much in
Benthamite and Austinian positivism, spurned the classical juristic tradition and defined
‘right’ as liberty in the sense of sheer absence of duty. So, people have most rights in the
state of nature where they have no duties. This move exemplifies regression in legal and,
more generally, in political and moral philosophy. Fortunately, the mistake is quite obvious.
If no one has any duties to or in respect of others, it will be more accurate to say that no one

27 *

PG

has any rights at all. For everyone, in such a state of affairs, is subject to being destroyed
or abused by everyone and anyone else, and everyone’s actions can be impeded as much
as any person or group cares, and is able, to arrange. The truth is that the concept of a
right makes little sense save as (the Hohfeldian claim-right) a correlative of someone else’s
duty, or (the Hohfeldian liberty) as protected by someone else’s duty of non-interference,
or (the Hohfeldian power) as promoted by the duty of officials and others to recognize and
effectuate one’s acts-in-the-law (or their ethical counterparts), or (the Hohfeldian immunity)
as protected by a similar duty of officials and others not to recognize another’s juridical
acts as it purportedly bears on my position.

(Extracted, with edits and revision, from The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy
of Law, Edited by Jules L. Coleman, Kenneth Einar Himma, and Scott J. Shapiro)

81. The Jural Correlative of Privilege is:
(a) Duty (b) Liability (c) No right (d) Disability

82. Which of the following statements is not true about Treatise on Law by St. Thomas
Aquinas?
(a) He classified law into eternal law, natural law, human law and divine law
(b) He belonged to the Historical School of Jurisprudence
(c) According to him, human nature is perfected or fully realised by harmonious and
habitual excellence in the exercise of its intrinsic capacities and powers
(d) The first primary precept is that good is to be pursued and done and evil avoided

83. Who said, “Right is an interest which is to be recognised, protected and enforced by
law”?
(A) Roscoe Pound (B) Salmond
(C) Holland (D) Bentham

84. Which of the following theories can be identified as a theory of right?
(A) Bracket theory (B) Fiction theory
(C) Will theory (D) Concession theory

85. Consider the given statements:
Statement I: Rights in Rem are the rights in the things of others, also called
encumbrances.
Statement II: Rights in Re propria means the right available against the whole
world.
Statement III: Rights in Personam mean the rights in one’s own things.
Choose the correct answer:
(A) Statement I is correct
(B) Statements I & II are correct
(C) Statements I, II & III are correct
(D) None of the above

* 28

PG

XVIII. The environmental rule of law, at a certain level, is a facet of the concept of the rule
of law. But it includes specific features that are unique to environmental governance,
features which are sui-generis. The environmental rule of law seeks to create essential
tools such as conceptual, procedural and institutional, to bring structure to the discourse
on environmental protection. It does so to enhance our understanding of environmental
challenges of how they have been shaped by humanity’s interface with nature in the past,
how they continue to be affected by its engagement with nature in the present and the
prospects for the future, if we were not to radically alter the course of destruction which
humanity’s actions have charted.

The environmental rule of law seeks to facilitate a multi-disciplinary analysis of the nature
and consequences of carbon footprints and in doing so it brings a shared understanding
between science, regulatory decisions and policy perspectives in the field of environmental
protection. It recognises that the “law” element in the environmental rule of law does not
make the concept peculiarly the preserve of Lawyers and Judges. On the contrary, it seeks
to draw within the fold all stakeholders in formulating strategies to deal with current
challenges posed by environmental degradation, climate change and the destruction of
habitats. The environmental rule of law seeks a unified understanding of these concepts.
There are significant linkages between concepts such as sustainable development, the
polluter pays principle etc. The universe of nature is indivisible and integrated. The state
of the environment in one part of the earth affects and is fundamentally affected by what
occurs in another part. Every element of the environment shares a symbiotic relationship
with the others. It is this inseparable bond and connect which the environmental rule of
law seeks to explore and understand in order to find solutions to the pressing problems
which threaten the existence of humanity. The environmental rule of law is founded on the
need to understand the consequences of our actions going beyond local, State and national
boundaries. The rise in the oceans threatens not just maritime communities. The rise in
temperatures, dilution of glaciers and growing desertification have consequences which
go beyond the communities and creatures whose habitats are threatened. They affect the
future survival of the entire eco-system. The environmental rule of law attempts to weave
an understanding of the connections in the natural environment which make the issue of
survival a unified challenge which confronts human societies everywhere.

(Extract from Pragnesh Shah v. Arunkumar Sharma (2022) 11 SCC 493 )

86. What distinguishes the environmental rule of law from the broader concept of the
rule of law?
(A) Its exclusive focus on legal principles
(B) Its emphasis on environmental governance
(C) Its reliance on judicial decisions
(D) Its alignment with international treaties

29 *

PG

87. What is the primary objective of the environmental rule of law?
(A) To protect wildlife habitats
(B) To enhance understanding of environmental challenges
(C) To promote economic development
(D) To enforce local environmental regulations

88. Environmental Protection and Improvement were incorporated into the Constitution
of India by inserting Articles 48-A and 51-A (g) by virtue of which of the following
amendments?
(A) 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 (B) 44th Amendment Act, 1978
(C) 45th Amendment Act, 1980 (D) 35th Amendment Act, 1974

89. In which international forum did the ‘Environmental rule of Law’ find recognition for
the first time?
(A) Stockholm Conference on Human Environment, 1970
(B) Rio Declaration on Environment, 1992
(C) Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, 2002
(D) UNEP’s Governing Council Decision 279, 2013

90. What does the environmental rule of law seek to achieve beyond local and national
boundaries?
(A) Economic growth (B) Environmental justice
(C) Political stability (D) Cultural preservation

XIX. Live-in relationship, as such, as already indicated, is a relationship which has not been
socially accepted in India, unlike many other countries. In Lata Singh v. State of U.P.
[(2006) 5 SCC 475: (2006) 2 SCC (Cri) 478] it was observed that a live-in relationship
between two consenting adults of heterosexual sex does not amount to any offence even
though it may be perceived as immoral. However, in order to provide a remedy in civil
law for protection of women, from being victims of such relationship, and to prevent the
occurrence of domestic violence in the society, first time in India, the DV Act has been
enacted to cover the couple having relationship in the nature of marriage, persons related
by consanguinity, marriages, etc. We have few other legislations also where reliefs have
been provided to woman placed in certain vulnerable situations. Section 125 Cr.P.C. of
course, provides for maintenance of a destitute wife and Section 498-A IPC is related to
mental cruelty inflicted on women by her husband and in-laws. Section 304-B IPC deals
with the cases relating to dowry death. The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 was enacted to
deal with the cases of dowry demands by the husband and family members. The Hindu
Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 provides for grant of maintenance to a legally wedded
Hindu wife, and also deals with rules for adoption. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 refers
to the provisions dealing with solemnisation of marriage also deals with the provisions for

* 30

PG

divorce. For the first time, though, the DV Act, Parliament has recognised a “relationship in
the nature of marriage” and not a live-in relationship simpliciter. We have already stated,
when we examine whether a relationship will fall within the expression “relationship in
the nature of marriage” within the meaning of Section 2(f ) of the DV Act, we should have a
close analysis of the entire relationship invariably, it may be a question of fact and degree,
whether a relationship between two unrelated persons of the opposite sex meets the tests
judicially evolved.

(This extract is taken from Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma, (2013) 15 SCC 755)

91. What is the scope of analysis required to determine if a relationship falls within
the expression “relationship in the nature of marriage” under Section 2(f) of the
DV Act?
(A) Considering the number of children born in a live in relationship
(B) Considering only the cohabitation period of the relationship and there emotional
connectivity
(C) Conducting a close analysis of the entire interpersonal relationship, taking into
account all facets
(D) Evaluating only the financial aspects and mutual agreements of the relationship,
and if there is any written agreement between the partner

92. In which of the following case, the Supreme Court read down the word “adult male”
in Section 2(q) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005?
(A) Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma
(B) Hiral P. Harsora v. Kusum Harsora
(C) Uma Narayan v. Priya Krishna Prasad
(D) All of the above

93. As per Section 20 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005,
while disposing of an application under Section 12(1), the Magistrate may direct the
respondent to pay monetary relief to the aggrieved person so that the aggrieved person
can:
(A) Live a life that meets at least the bare minimum needs for survival and basic
well-being
(B) Live a life that is consistent with her standard of living which she is
accustomed
(C) Live a life that is consistent with her parent’s standard of living
(D) Live a life which can cover her medical expenses and expenses incurred due to
litigation of domestic violence

31 *

PG

94. In which case, the three-judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court has recently
interpreted the term “shared household” and has held that “…lives or at any stage
has lived in a domestic relationship…” have to be given its normal and purposeful
meaning. The living of woman in a household has to refer to a living which has some
permanency. Mere fleeting or casual living at different places shall not make a shared
household?
(A) Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja
(B) Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra
(C) S.R. Batra v. Tarun Batra
(D) B.R. Mehta v. Atma Devi

95. Under Indian Law, can a woman in a live in relationship claim maintenance under
S. 125, Cr.P.C. despite not being a legally wedded wife?
(A) No, as per the interpretation of statute ‘wife’ means legally wedded wife and
includes who has been divorced by, or has obtained a divorce from her husband
(B) Yes, a woman in a live in relationship can claim maintenance u/s 125, Cr.P.C.
as strict proof of marriage is not necessary and maintenance cannot be denied if
evidence suggests cohabitation
(C) A woman in live in relationship can only claim maintenance if she has
been cohabiting for more than five years and dependent children from the
relationship
(D) A woman in live in relationship can claim maintenance only through a civil suit
as the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDVA) does not
apply to live in relationships

XX. Article 14 of the Constitution stipulates that the State shall not deny to any person equality
before the law or the equal protection of laws within the territory of India. Article 15(1) states
that the State should not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race,
caste, sex, place of birth or any of them. Article 15(4) stipulates that nothing in Article 15
shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any
socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and
the Scheduled Tribes. Article 16 deals with equality of opportunity in matters of public
employment. Clause (1) of Article 16 guarantees equality of opportunity for all citizens in
matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State. Clause (2)
stipulates that no citizen shall be discriminated in or be ineligible for any employment or
office under the State on the grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of
birth, residence or any of them. Clause (4) of the provision states that nothing in Article 16
shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or
posts in favour of any backward class of citizens, which in the opinion of the State, is not
adequately represented in the services under the State. The purpose of the equal opportunity
principle in Article 16(1) and the reservation provision in Article 16(4) has emerged as a
focal point of the jurisprudence on reservations in this Court. A discussion of the journey
of the competing models of equality that the Court has espoused and their evolution over
the course of the years is necessary to understand the constitutional vision on equality.

* 32

PG

The impugned constitutional amendments by which Article 16 (4-A) and 16 (4-B) have
been inserted, flow from Article 16 (4). They do not alter the structure of Article 16 (4).
They retain the controlling factors or the compelling reasons which enables the State to
provide for reservation keeping in mind the overall efficiency of the state administration
under article 335. Sub-categorization within a class is a constitutional requirement to
secure substantive equality in the event that there is a distinction between two sections
of a class; Sub-classification must not lead to the exclusion of one of the categories in the
class. A model that provides sufficient opportunities to all categories of the class must be
adopted; and Sub-classification among a class must be on a reasonable basis.
Justice Bela Trivedi opined, in dissent, that presidential list of scheduled castes notified
under Article 341 cannot be altered by the States. Any change to this list can only be made
by a law enacted by Parliament. Sub-classification, according to her would amount to
tampering with the Presidential List and undermine the object Article 341, which aims to
eliminate political influence in the SC-ST List. Further, she emphasised the importance of
adhering to the rule of plain and literal interpretation. She mentions that any preferential
treatment for a sub-class within the presidential list would deprive other classes within
the same category of their benefits. In the absence of executive or legislative power, state
lack the competence to sub-classify castes and the benefit reserved for all SCs. Allowing
states to do so would constitute a colourable exercise of power, which is impermissible under
law. Justice Trivedi concluded by affirming that affirmative action by States must remain
within constitutional boundaries and held that the law laid down in E.V. Chinnaiah case
was correct and should be upheld.
(Extract from The State of Punjab & Ors. v. Davinder Singh & Ors. 2024 SC)

96. The issue of whether the State can further sub-classify within a class for the purpose
of reservation first arose in:
(A) MR Balaji v. State of Mysore
(B) T. Devadasan v. Union of India
(C) Akhil Bharatiya Soshit Karamchari Sangh (Railway) v. Union of India
(D) The State of Punjab & Ors. v. Davinder Singh & Ors. 2020

97. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, while proposing the inclusion of Articles 300A and 300B of the
Draft Constitution (which correspond to Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution),
indicated that once notified, any elimination from the list or an addition to the list was
to be made by Parliament and not by the President. This limitation was imposed to:
(A) Protect the rights of the SCs and STs class people
(B) To exclude the further interference of the Executive having a play in the matter
of the disturbance in the Schedule so published by the President
(C) To remove the discretion in the hands of Executive to save the interest of the SCs
and STs people
(D) To eliminate “political factors” from disturbing the list

33 *

PG

98. The trinity of Articles 14, 15, and 16 has provided a tool to march towards social and
economic equality. Emphasis has been given to affirmative action so as to give a special
treatment to the underprivileged so that they can march forward. Reservations in the
matters of education and in public employment have been used to provide a special
treatment to the backward classes. What are the other articles of the Constitution
along with, the objective of the Constitution to achieve social economic equality may
be achieved?
(A) Arts. 46, 335 and 338
(B) Arts. 335, 341 and 342
(C) Arts. 46, 335, 338, 341 and 342
(D) Arts. 46, 335 and 342

99. Hon’ble Justice B.R. Gavai, in the above-mentioned judgment held that, “sub-classification
amongst the Scheduled Castes for giving more beneficial treatment is permissible in
law”. He also gave some criteria on which the sub-classification may be implemented
by the State. Which of the following is that criteria?
(A) The criteria for exclusion of the creamy layer from the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes for the purpose of affirmative action could be different from the
criteria as applicable to the Other Backward Classes
(B) Sub-classification would be permissible only if there is a reservation for a
sub-class as well as the larger class
(C) That while doing so, the State will have to justify the same on the basis of empirical
data that a sub-class in whose favour such more beneficial treatment is provided
is not adequately represented
(D) All of the above

100. Which of the following is not required for sub-classification of the Scheduled Caste?
(A) The inadequacy of representation of a caste/group because of its backwardness
(B) The data must be collected by the State on the inadequacy of representation
of a caste in the “services of the State” because it is used as an indicator of
backwardness
(C) Efficiency of administration must be viewed in a manner which promotes inclusion
and equality as required by Article 16(1)
(D) The State in exercise of the power under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) is not required
to further classify the Scheduled Castes

* 34

PG

XXI. The elements of tort of negligence consist in – (a) duty of care; (b) duty is owed to the
plaintiff; (c) the duty has been carelessly breached. Negligence does not entail liability
unless the exacts a duty in the given circumstances to observe care. Duty is an obligation
recognised by law to avoid conduct fraught with unreasonable risk of damage to others.
The question whether duty exists in a particular situation involves determination of law.
Hence, three ingredients are necessary for the existence of a duty of care: (i) foreseeability
of the damage, (ii) proximity of relationship between the parties; and (iii) whether it is
“just, fair and reasonable” that the law should impose a duty of care. In Caparo Industries
Plc. v. Dickman, 1990 2AC 605, the court held that breach of duty is concerned with the
standard of care that ought to have been adopted in the circumstances and whether the
defendant’s conduct fell below that standard i.e., whether he was careless.

The court while quoting Rajkot Municipal Corporation v. Manjulben Jayantilal Nakum,
1997 stated that as a tort, negligence consists of legal duty to take care and breach of that
duty. Duty determines whether the type of loss suffered by the plaintiff in the particular
way in which to occurred can ever be actionable. The division of negligence into duty, breach
and consequent damage is convenient for the purpose of exposition but it can be confusing
because the issues will often overlap. The process of determining a breach of duty involves
three steps: First, it is necessary to ascertain the qualities of the reasonable person, given
the qualities attributed to him, would have taken in the circumstances. The factors that
are permissible to take into account in this regard are prescribed by law, but the amount of
care that the reasonable person would have taken is a question of fact. Thirdly, it must be
determined whether the defendant took less care than the reasonable person would have
taken.

(Extracts from Managing Director, Kerala Tourism Development Corporation Limited v.
Deepti Singh and Ors., 2019 SC)

101. In the context of negligence, which of the following scenarios best demonstrates the
presence of all essential elements?

(A) A doctor prescribes the wrong medication to a patient, but the patient’s immune
system prevents any harmful side effects and the patient does not suffer any
injury

(B) A driver runs a red light, narrowly avoiding an accident with another car and
both vehicles continue without any collision or harm

(C) A hotel guest tragically drowns in the swimming pool as the lifeguard was assigned
duties as a part time bartender

(D) A construction company delays necessary maintenance on a bridge and despite
having major cracks the bridge remains functional

35 *

PG

102. Reasonable foreseeability means:
(A) Mere possibility
(B) Expectation of sensible person
(C) Foreseeability of probable consequences of his act by an average prudent
person
(D) Remote possibility of a particular consequence of his consequence by a reasonable
person

103. A renowned judgment in which reasonable foreseeability test was discussed by the
Privy Council, was:
(A) Scott v. Shephard
(B) Overseas Tankship UK Ltd. v. Morts Dock and Engineering Co. Ltd. (Wagon
Mound Case)
(C) Donoghue v. Stevenson
(D) Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co

104. In which of the following judgment the neighbour principle was propounded?
(A) Scott v. Shephard
(B) Rylands v. Fletcher
(C) Donoghue v. Stevenson
(D) Overseas Tankship UK Ltd. v. Morts Dock and Engineering Co. Ltd. (Wagon
Mound Case)

105. Compensation is to be assessed on the basis of:
(A) Rough estimate of loss generally resulting from death
(B) Approximate calculation of damage as a result of death
(C) Legitimate expectation of loss of pecuniary benefits
(D) Closeness in relationship between claimants and the deceased

XXII. Ahmadi, J. (as he then was) speaking for himself and Punchhi, J., endorsed the
recommendations in the following words-The time is ripe for taking stock of the working of
the various Tribunals set up in the country after the insertion of Articles 323-A and 323-B
in the Constitution. After the incorporation of these two articles, Acts have been enacted
where-under tribunals have been constituted for dispensation of justice. Sufficient time has
passed and experience gained in these last few years for taking stock of the situation with
a view to finding out if they have served the purpose and objectives for which they were
constituted. Complaints have been heard in regard to the functioning of other tribunals
as well and it is time that a body like the Law Commission of India has a comprehensive
look-in with a view to suggesting measures for their improved functioning. That body can

* 36

PG

also suggest changes in the different statutes and evolve a model on the basis whereof
tribunals may be constituted or reconstituted with a view to ensuring greater independence.
An intensive and extensive study needs to be undertaken by the Law Commission in
regard to the Constitution of tribunals under various statutes with a view to ensuring their
independence so that the public confidence in such tribunals may increase and the quality
of their performance may improve.
Before parting with the case, it is necessary to express our anguish over the
ineffectiveness of the alternative mechanism devised for judicial review. The judicial review
and remedy are the fundamental rights of the citizens. The dispensation of justice by the
tribunal is much to be desired.
(Extracted with Edits from R.K. Jain v. Union of India, 1993 (4) SCC 119)

106. In which of the following case the Court held that though judicial review is a basic
feature of the Constitution, the vesting of the power of judicial review in an alternative
institutional mechanism, after taking it away from the High Courts, would not violate
the basic structure so long as it was ensured that the alternative mechanism was an
effective and real substitute for the High Court?
(A) L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Others 1997
(B) R.K. Jain v. Union of India 1993
(C) S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India 1985
(D) Kesvananda Bharati v. State of Kerala 1973

107. The provisions of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 shall not apply to:
(A) Any member of the naval, military or air forces or of any other armed forces of
the Union
(B) Officer or servant of the Supreme Court or of any High Court or Courts
subordinate
(C) Person appointed to the secretarial staff of either House of Parliament or to the
secretarial staff of any State Legislature or a House thereof or, in the case of a
Union Territory having a Legislature, of that Legislature
(D) All of the above

108. The first tribunal established in India is:
(A) Central Administrative Tribunal
(B) Railway Claims Tribunal
(C) Armed Forces Tribunal
(D) Income tax Appellate Tribunal

37 *

PG

109. Articles 323-A and 323-B of the Indian Constitution for the establishment of tribunal
to adjudicate disputes in specific matters. While both articles deal with tribunals, there
are key differences in their scope and application. Which of the following statement
correctly reflects the distinction between Articles 323-A and 323-B?
(A) Article 323-A exclusively deals with administrative tribunals for public service
matters, while Article 323-B deals with the tribunals for a wider range of subjects
including taxation and land reforms
(B) While tribunals under Article 323-A can be established only by Parliament,
tribunals under Article 323-B can only be established by State legislature, with
matters falling within their legislative competence
(C) Under Article 323-A, only one tribunal for centre and no tribunal for state may
be established. As far as Article 323-B is concerned, there is no hierarchy of
tribunals
(D) Article 323-A grant tribunals the power to hear appeals directly from the Supreme
Court, by passing the High Court. Under Article 323-B there is no such power

110. The National Green Tribunal Act was passed in the year:
(A) 2007 (B) 2008
(C) 2009 (D) 2010

XXIII. The Companies Act, 2013 does not deal with insolvency and bankruptcy when the companies
are unable to pay their debts or the aspects relating to the revival and rehabilitation of the
companies and their winding up if revival and rehabilitation is not possible. In principle, it
cannot be doubted that the cases of revival or winding up of the company on the ground of
insolvency and inability to pay debts are different from cases where companies are wound up
under Section 271 of the Companies Act, 2013. The two situations are not identical. Under
Section 271 of the Companies Act, 2013, even a running and financially sound company
can also be wound up for the reasons in clauses (a) to (e). The reasons and grounds for
winding up under Section 271 of the Companies Act, 2013 are vastly different from the
reasons and grounds for the revival and rehabilitation scheme as envisaged under the IBC.
The two enactments deal with two distinct situations and in our opinion, they cannot be
equated when we examine whether there is discrimination or violation of Article 14 of the
Constitution of India. For the revival and rehabilitation of the companies, certain sacrifices
are required from all quarters, including the workmen. In case of insolvent companies, for
the sake of survival and regeneration, everyone, including the secured creditors and the
Central and State Government, are required to make sacrifices. The workmen also have a
stake and benefit from the revival of the company, and therefore unless it is found that the
sacrifices envisaged for the workmen, which certainly form a separate class, are onerous and
burdensome so as to be manifestly unjust and arbitrary, we will not set aside the legislation,

* 38

PG

solely on the ground that some or marginal sacrifice is to be made by the workers. We
would also reject the argument that to find out whether there was a violation of Article 14
of the Constitution of India or whether the right to life under Article 21 Constitution of
India was infringed, we must word by word examine the waterfall mechanism envisaged
under the Companies Act, 2013, where the company is wound up in terms of grounds
(a) to (e) of Section 271 of the Companies Act, 2013; and the rights of the workmen when the
insolvent company is sought to be revived, rehabilitated or wound up under the Code. The
grounds and situations in the context of the objective and purpose of the two enactments
are entirely different.
(Extracted, with edits and revision, from the judgement in Moser Baer Karamchari Union Thr.
President Mahesh Chand Sharma v. Union of India and Ors, 2023 SCC Online SC 547)

111. In which of the following cases, it was held by the Supreme Court addressed
shareholders rights, RB’s role and judicial Intervention?
(A) Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Escorts Ltd
(B) R. K. Dalmia v. Delhi Administration
(C) Dale And Carrington Invt. P. Ltd. v. P.K. Prathapan
(D) Rohtas Industries Ltd v. S.D. Agarwal & Anr

112. The extent to which a corporation as a legal person can be held criminally liable for
its acts and omissions and for those of the natural persons employed by it is called
(A) Corporate manslaughter
(B) Lifting the corporate veil
(C) Corporate criminal liability
(D) Corporate social responsibility

113. In which of the following cases, the constitutionality of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016 was upheld by the Supreme Court?
(A) RPS Infrastructure Ltd. v. Union of India
(B) Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Union of India
(C) Union Bank of India v. Financial Creditors of M/s Amtek Auto Limited
(D) Swiss Ribbons v. Union of India

114. A Director other than a managing Director or a whole-time Director or a nominee
Director who does not have any material or pecuniary relationship with the company/
Directors other than the remuneration is called
(A) Impartial Director (B) Promoter
(C) Independent Director (D) Associate Director

39 *

PG

115. Which among the following is not a duty of a Director of the company?
(A) To file return of allotments
(B) To disclose interest
(C) Duty to call upon the shareholders to attend the Board meetings
(D) To convene General meeting

XXIV. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘Nil Ratan Kundu and another v. Abhijit Kundu’
2008(3) Apex Court Judgements 232 (SC), while granting the custody to the maternal
grandparents observed: In our judgement, the law relating to custody of a child is fairly well
settled and it is this. In deciding a difficult and complex question as to custody of minor, a
Court of law should keep in mind relevant statutes and the rights flowing therefrom. But
such cases cannot be decided solely by interpreting legal provisions. It is a humane problem
in live in relationship and is required to be solved with human touch. A Court while dealing
with custody cases, is neither bound by statutes nor by strict rules of evidence or procedure
nor by precedents. In selecting proper guardian of a minor, the paramount consideration
should be the welfare and well-being of the child. In selecting a guardian, the Court is
exercising parens patriae jurisdiction and is expected, may bound, to give due weight to
a child’s ordinary comfort, contentment, health, education, intellectual development and
favorable surroundings. But over and above physical comforts, moral and ethical values
cannot be ignored. They are equally, or we may say, even more important, essential and
indispensable consideration. If the minor is old enough to form an intelligent preference
or judgement, the Court must consider such preference as well, though the final decision
should rest with the Court as to what is conducive to the welfare of the minor.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘Gaurav Nagpal v. Semedha Nagpal’-(2009)1 SCC 42,
while giving paramount importance to the welfare of the child, which should include moral
and ethical values, besides ethical well-being, observed as under: -
When the court is confronted with conflicting demands made by the parents, each time it
has to justify the demands. The Court has not only to look at the issue on legalistic basis,
in such matters human angles are relevant for deciding those issues. The Court then does
not give emphasis on what the parties say, it has to exercise a jurisdiction which is aimed
at the welfare of the minor. As observed recently in Mausami Moitra Ganguli case, the
Court has to give due weightage to the child’s ordinary contentment, health, education,
intellectual development and favorable surroundings, but over and above physical comforts,
the moral and ethical values have also to be noted. They are equal if not more important
than the others.
(Extracts from Jaswinder Singh and Another vs Surjit Singh, AIR 2010 (NOC) 425 (P. & H.))

116. According to the passage, which is the most indispensable consideration in deciding
the matters of custody of the child?
(A) Financial ability of the parents
(B) Sex of the child and its age at the relevant time
(C) Physical Comfort, possibility of recreational activities of the child
(D) Environment conducive to development of moral and ethical values

* 40

PG

117. The provision of custody of child under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act,
1956 gives:
(A) Right of custody to mother, if child is below five years of age
(B) Preferential custody right to father
(C) Custody right to any close relative who is found suitable
(D) Preferential consideration to mother, in case the child is below five years of age

118. The sensitivity in judicial decision making is manifest in this passage from the court’s
observation that:
(A) custody of child can be given to grandparents
(B) welfare of child is paramount consideration
(C) ethical and moral wellbeing is given priority
(D) custody cases cannot be decided solely by interpreting legal provisions but is
required to be solved with human touch

119. What does the passage state about the opinion of a child who is old enough to state
its preference regarding custody?
(A) the child has a right to get custody order according to his preference
(B) the child’s preference in relation to his custody is immaterial
(C) the child’s preference must be considered but the court is the final deciding
authority regarding the custody
(D) court is bound by the child’s preference in relation to custody even if it differs in
its opinion about whom to grant the custody

120. The considerations for the decision in relation to custody of child, is subject to which
of the following basis as mentioned in Sec.13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship
Act, 1956?
(A) Welfare of the child is the paramount consideration
(B) Wishes of the child form the primary basis in custody cases
(C) Child’s health and educational needs are primary considerations
(D) Suitability of the person claiming custody is the basic consideration a Protection
Order has a time limit of six months, while a Residence Order is permanent

41 *

Entrance Exams
Agricultural Entrance Exams
Architecture Entrance Exam
Arts and Humanities Entrance Exams
Commerce Entrance Examinations
Common Entrance Examinations
Computer Application Entrance Exams
Design Entrance Exams
Education Entrance Exams
Engineering Entrance Exams
Hotel Management Entrance Exams
Law Entrance Exams
MBA Entrance Exams
Media & Journalism Entrance Exams
Medical Entrance Exams
Nursing Entrance Exams
Pharmacy Entrance Exams
Science Entrance Exams
Diploma & Polytechnic
Lateral Entry